Now let them repeal the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act which basically clobbered the original Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 (and the subsequent strengthening of it by amendment in 1972 and 1985). This "modernization" is what has allowed the MSM to lose it's very soul and allow propaganda to be fed to the American public, becoming FNM in the process.
That would be a nice third pillar, to form a legal tripod, with this "Corner Post" and the removal of the Chevron Deference, IMHO.
Article (by leftists) that describes the strengthening amendments in 1972 and 1985. The leftist author(s) who support Obama clobbering this protection in his "Modernization" claim that allowing Americans to be subject to the same propaganda as foreigners is a-ok. Still, the write-up about the amendments has some good nuggets of info - that the 1972 one was implemented to quash an infiltrating communist influence and the 1985 one was to prohibit taxpayer funding of any propaganda (NPR anyone?). For example of a corrosive propaganda outlet that should not be taxpayer funded -- During Obama's first fraudulent term, George Soros, through his OSI, was able to get his lizard talons into NPR just before Obama clobbered the protections of the original Smith-Mundt Act and it's amendments with his 2013 "modernization".
From wiki on NPR -- "... In October 2010, NPR accepted a $1.8 million grant from the Open Society Institute. The grant is meant to begin a project called Impact of Government that was intended to add at least 100 journalists at NPR member radio stations in all 50 states by 2013.[28] The OSI has made previous donations but does not take on-air credit for its gifts.[29] ..."
The Q team needed the current version of the law so it could create propaganda. We know they replaced people in all of the news corporations as far back as 2018. Yet, nothing changed (until after the debate.)
By not changing their attacks on Trump and conservatives, people have been red-pilled much more than if their favorite news orgs had suddenly changed the narrative. They see for themselves, rather than being told.
Now let them repeal the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act which basically clobbered the original Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 (and the subsequent strengthening of it by amendment in 1972 and 1985). This "modernization" is what has allowed the MSM to lose it's very soul and allow propaganda to be fed to the American public, becoming FNM in the process.
That would be a nice third pillar, to form a legal tripod, with this "Corner Post" and the removal of the Chevron Deference, IMHO.
.
Article from 2016 --
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/north_america/americas-current-economy/congress-authorized-propaganda-against-americans/
.
Article (by leftists) that describes the strengthening amendments in 1972 and 1985. The leftist author(s) who support Obama clobbering this protection in his "Modernization" claim that allowing Americans to be subject to the same propaganda as foreigners is a-ok. Still, the write-up about the amendments has some good nuggets of info - that the 1972 one was implemented to quash an infiltrating communist influence and the 1985 one was to prohibit taxpayer funding of any propaganda (NPR anyone?). For example of a corrosive propaganda outlet that should not be taxpayer funded -- During Obama's first fraudulent term, George Soros, through his OSI, was able to get his lizard talons into NPR just before Obama clobbered the protections of the original Smith-Mundt Act and it's amendments with his 2013 "modernization".
From wiki on NPR -- "... In October 2010, NPR accepted a $1.8 million grant from the Open Society Institute. The grant is meant to begin a project called Impact of Government that was intended to add at least 100 journalists at NPR member radio stations in all 50 states by 2013.[28] The OSI has made previous donations but does not take on-air credit for its gifts.[29] ..."
https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/pdin_monitor_article/smith-mundt-belatedly-enters-21st-century
The Q team needed the current version of the law so it could create propaganda. We know they replaced people in all of the news corporations as far back as 2018. Yet, nothing changed (until after the debate.)
By not changing their attacks on Trump and conservatives, people have been red-pilled much more than if their favorite news orgs had suddenly changed the narrative. They see for themselves, rather than being told.
I believe this as well.