100 year's from now there will be two asshole professors debating j6 and omb. Believing it all. Fake news as reality, living in history, as fact. Utopian, 1984 bologna, that it is.
The trial was only to decide how much money he owed. In that trial, he was not even allowed to claim innocence of the charges. He was convicted by summary judgement of the charges (without trial) b/c he could not come up with docs they claim he had. It seems to be a setup all the way to get him off the air. He is appealing the summary judgement, but that takes time.
My theory about Alex Jones (and it is just my theory) is that he was a limited hangout who was against those who handled him. He pushed against it many times over the years, but he was especially not supposed to push the idea that Sandy Hook was a hoax. He couldn't help but go against them and he got absolutely hammered for it.
Did Alex Jones use this in his trial?
never would be allowed
Insane. Wonder what stupid reason they would give?
We have to pretend it's real. Just like the worst attack on America ever - J6; in its entire history.
100 year's from now there will be two asshole professors debating j6 and omb. Believing it all. Fake news as reality, living in history, as fact. Utopian, 1984 bologna, that it is.
The trial was only to decide how much money he owed. In that trial, he was not even allowed to claim innocence of the charges. He was convicted by summary judgement of the charges (without trial) b/c he could not come up with docs they claim he had. It seems to be a setup all the way to get him off the air. He is appealing the summary judgement, but that takes time.
My theory about Alex Jones (and it is just my theory) is that he was a limited hangout who was against those who handled him. He pushed against it many times over the years, but he was especially not supposed to push the idea that Sandy Hook was a hoax. He couldn't help but go against them and he got absolutely hammered for it.
Hope he gets vindicated soon.