Now the challenge is to have those unaborted to have healthy reproductive systems that the food, environment and culture are busy destroying. Not dooming but prognosticating.
When a baby is conceived, the egg splits into two identical cells carrying the DNA of Father and Mother. After that the 2 cells become 4 identical cells, then 8, then 16 and so forth until there are hundreds of identical cells and then something happens nobody understands, a few of the identical cells become the heart, some the lungs, some a backbone and so on. What made these cells decide to do all these different things since the DNA is the same in all of them? THIS is why I believe God plays a crucial roll in the birth of every child just like the scripture says!
And that is why "Scientists" are now tinkering with the programing (DNA) . Because their owners want to be or think they are God's. Psychopaths should never be in charge.
Many times even those last 5 can be saved, because often the diagnosis a doctor gives is wrong, and the baby is perfectly healthy when it is born. But still this is SUCH a huge win, saving 4,395 babies every month! That's 52,740 babies EVERY YEAR! Praise Jesus!
I wouldn't call outlawing abortion in the entire state "incrementalism"
As someone that is part of EndAbortionNow.com (we wrote part of the amicus brief that overturned Roe v Wade) In the context of abortion we would define incrementalism as making minor laws against abortion to reduce the number I'm abortions by percentage, incrementally, over time. Not all at once.
Fully banning, outlawing, and criminalization obviously works far better than incrementalism since we had 30+ years of incrementalism prior to Rove v Wade being overturned.
As someone that heavily involved in this space I would encourage you to not use "incrementalism" in this context. (States banning it individually)
That's not what the word is generally understood as in this context. This is more of a "states rights works" where some states are choosing to abolish (the opposite of incrementalism) abortion.
Our organization and most others we work with have zero desire for a special federal abortion ban. This is a states issue. We would like the federal government to recognize the biological FACT that an unborn child is fully human from the moment of conception however. This would have a greater and more unassailable impact
Now the challenge is to have those unaborted to have healthy reproductive systems that the food, environment and culture are busy destroying. Not dooming but prognosticating.
When a baby is conceived, the egg splits into two identical cells carrying the DNA of Father and Mother. After that the 2 cells become 4 identical cells, then 8, then 16 and so forth until there are hundreds of identical cells and then something happens nobody understands, a few of the identical cells become the heart, some the lungs, some a backbone and so on. What made these cells decide to do all these different things since the DNA is the same in all of them? THIS is why I believe God plays a crucial roll in the birth of every child just like the scripture says!
Amen! God's Design is Miraculous! 🙌
And always close to each of us!
YES! 🙌
And that is why "Scientists" are now tinkering with the programing (DNA) . Because their owners want to be or think they are God's. Psychopaths should never be in charge.
Correct!
Many times even those last 5 can be saved, because often the diagnosis a doctor gives is wrong, and the baby is perfectly healthy when it is born. But still this is SUCH a huge win, saving 4,395 babies every month! That's 52,740 babies EVERY YEAR! Praise Jesus!
I wouldn't call outlawing abortion in the entire state "incrementalism"
As someone that is part of EndAbortionNow.com (we wrote part of the amicus brief that overturned Roe v Wade) In the context of abortion we would define incrementalism as making minor laws against abortion to reduce the number I'm abortions by percentage, incrementally, over time. Not all at once.
Fully banning, outlawing, and criminalization obviously works far better than incrementalism since we had 30+ years of incrementalism prior to Rove v Wade being overturned.
As someone that heavily involved in this space I would encourage you to not use "incrementalism" in this context. (States banning it individually)
That's not what the word is generally understood as in this context. This is more of a "states rights works" where some states are choosing to abolish (the opposite of incrementalism) abortion.
Our organization and most others we work with have zero desire for a special federal abortion ban. This is a states issue. We would like the federal government to recognize the biological FACT that an unborn child is fully human from the moment of conception however. This would have a greater and more unassailable impact
WOW!
Money grubbin who'ers bigtime mad....
Planned parenthood ....
Do the Red Cross next...
Oh, I'm sure that will occur. Just give it time.