There is a MASSIVE difference between a body double and what you seem to be claiming. Also the image you have is the same person. Facial wrinkle mapping matches (which can't be faked by a "flexible" mask)
ya... this is completely the same person in these two photo's. Odd pic to use to drive a point. Teeth are the same... eyes, facial structure. Difference in lens, angle, distance, and glasses... thats it. Regardless... NCSWIC!!!
The ears and the nose are totally different. donβt try and gaslight us into thinking this is the same person. Itβs just not. I would expect this from the MSM but not our own people π€¦ββοΈ
Take a zoomed in pic from say 20 feet vs. a not zoomed in pic from 5 feet. Lenses and all equate to the head being the same exact size... but the nose and ears will look different. If you take this into account and look at the pics you can tell they are the same. There is zero gaslighting on this... but I'm gonna point out what I think is a bad call due to perspective differences.
Actually no, facial wrinkle maps are not something matched. Fine wrinkles would not flex and match, this is precisely why forensic facial wrinkle mapping exists, because it's not fakable without digitally adding it in.
This looks like the same guy, although I believe one of the images is flipped horizontally. Look at the brow wrinkles above his nose and the lines around the corners of his mouth.
Flipping a person's face horizontally can sometimes have an uncanny effect, especially when the face isn't perfectly symmetrical.
There are other focal length, angle, and lighting differences that can explain everything seen here.
There is a MASSIVE difference between a body double and what you seem to be claiming. Also the image you have is the same person. Facial wrinkle mapping matches (which can't be faked by a "flexible" mask)
"What you seem to be claiming"
Try actually looking at what I'm claiming.
Look past your own nose.. and look at his nose. And ears.
Facial wrinkles are easily faked, since they use latex facial applications cast from a single mold
ya... this is completely the same person in these two photo's. Odd pic to use to drive a point. Teeth are the same... eyes, facial structure. Difference in lens, angle, distance, and glasses... thats it. Regardless... NCSWIC!!!
The ears and the nose are totally different. donβt try and gaslight us into thinking this is the same person. Itβs just not. I would expect this from the MSM but not our own people π€¦ββοΈ
Yikes π¬
Take a zoomed in pic from say 20 feet vs. a not zoomed in pic from 5 feet. Lenses and all equate to the head being the same exact size... but the nose and ears will look different. If you take this into account and look at the pics you can tell they are the same. There is zero gaslighting on this... but I'm gonna point out what I think is a bad call due to perspective differences.
The ears are completely different.
so is the nose
Actually no, facial wrinkle maps are not something matched. Fine wrinkles would not flex and match, this is precisely why forensic facial wrinkle mapping exists, because it's not fakable without digitally adding it in.
This looks like the same guy, although I believe one of the images is flipped horizontally. Look at the brow wrinkles above his nose and the lines around the corners of his mouth.
Flipping a person's face horizontally can sometimes have an uncanny effect, especially when the face isn't perfectly symmetrical.
There are other focal length, angle, and lighting differences that can explain everything seen here.
I do my own stunts & have a double chin...does that count? πππ
They ALL have them.