I can accept that politicians might use body doubles for public appearances from a distance, but THE IDEA (to quote the real Joe Biden) that multiple people can give speeches and have close-up photos taken and still be identified as the same old man with no credible anomalies between the different "actors"?
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Blurry screenshots side by side with different camera lenses, angles, lighting, and phases of known plastic surgery do not count as extraordinary proof.
Kim Clement said that the solution to save America was so simple, yet so ingenious, that only God himself could have come up with it. All this double/clone bullshit just doesn't fit the book in my view.
For me, one of the significant reasons I find the double/clone theory very unconvincing is that the 'evidence' of 4 grainy photos, (or the dozens of other photos that people cite as "proof") are never accompanied by something that might actually have the weight of evidence: for example, an analysis by a practiced and skilled physician specializing in anatomy, or in geriatric science, or in forensic biology, etc.
It's always "Duh! Look! Can't you SEE that they are not the same person!???"
I'm sure the mask tech is highly advanced, but last time I checked, masks don't give someone the ability to perfectly mimic the voice and speech patterns of another human.
Software already can take voice clips and generate new dialogue out of whole cloth. It's going to wreck the voice acting profession. It's already public on small level, so voice is no problem.
I can accept that politicians might use body doubles for public appearances from a distance, but THE IDEA (to quote the real Joe Biden) that multiple people can give speeches and have close-up photos taken and still be identified as the same old man with no credible anomalies between the different "actors"?
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Blurry screenshots side by side with different camera lenses, angles, lighting, and phases of known plastic surgery do not count as extraordinary proof.
Kim Clement said that the solution to save America was so simple, yet so ingenious, that only God himself could have come up with it. All this double/clone bullshit just doesn't fit the book in my view.
Yep.
For me, one of the significant reasons I find the double/clone theory very unconvincing is that the 'evidence' of 4 grainy photos, (or the dozens of other photos that people cite as "proof") are never accompanied by something that might actually have the weight of evidence: for example, an analysis by a practiced and skilled physician specializing in anatomy, or in geriatric science, or in forensic biology, etc.
It's always "Duh! Look! Can't you SEE that they are not the same person!???"
Have you seen all the videos of how advanced and convincing masks have become that have floating around on social?
Have you seen the video of Biden scratching the back of his neck, and it leaving an indentation?
I'm sure the mask tech is highly advanced, but last time I checked, masks don't give someone the ability to perfectly mimic the voice and speech patterns of another human.
Of course not. Actors do that. They also wear masks
No they don't. Actors do the best that they can, but even the best celebrity impersonators are far from perfect.
Software already can take voice clips and generate new dialogue out of whole cloth. It's going to wreck the voice acting profession. It's already public on small level, so voice is no problem.
In order for this sort of tech to be used during the debate, Trump would have to be in on it and ok with it. Even then I find it hard to believe.