First, they own everything. That's not hyperbole, it's the legal truth. Every single asset that anyone within any legal system (citizen of any government) anywhere on the planet thinks they own is technically owned by them as Trustee (and, if they wish, at any time they want as beneficiary). Why do you think the IRS can take everything you own at anytime they want on suspicion of a "tax crime?"
Normally I'd say "read my report," but this entire thread is someone else putting out part of my report (Welcome To The Machine) that shows that they own everything. I mean, I haven't actually gotten to exactly how they own every single thing everywhere yet, but what's there right now is a pretty solid intro.
As for Mars, if we have bases there, they are owned by the Cabal, period.
patriots are in control
Just because there is a new controller (ostensibly), doesn't change the legal structure. Being in control of a thing and "owning" a thing are not legally the same thing. The Cabal could still legally "own Mars" and not have operational input ("strings cut")..
cabals legal tricks will work for them as long as God allows them to
I am by no means convinced that it is up to the Divine. On the contrary, I think it is very much up to us. Regardless, their tricks are still the law of the land, which means they are still the beliefs of the masses, which means they are still as real as a thing gets within the construct of society, which is the only place where the concept of "ownership" means anything at all.
I'm not sure if that's true at all. The Source of All Things is the Source. There is nothing that is not already, and eternally, fundamentally connected to Source. The concept of "ownership" doesn't really apply in any meaningful (distinctive) way.
Ownership is a construct of the individual person (this piece of bread is mine, this fishing pole is mine, etc.), and by extension a social construct (we agree the bread is yours, we disagree about the fishing pole, etc.). It doesn't really have meaning outside of those scopes.
First, they own everything. That's not hyperbole, it's the legal truth. Every single asset that anyone within any legal system (citizen of any government) anywhere on the planet thinks they own is technically owned by them as Trustee (and, if they wish, at any time they want as beneficiary). Why do you think the IRS can take everything you own at anytime they want on suspicion of a "tax crime?"
Normally I'd say "read my report," but this entire thread is someone else putting out part of my report (Welcome To The Machine) that shows that they own everything. I mean, I haven't actually gotten to exactly how they own every single thing everywhere yet, but what's there right now is a pretty solid intro.
As for Mars, if we have bases there, they are owned by the Cabal, period.
Just because there is a new controller (ostensibly), doesn't change the legal structure. Being in control of a thing and "owning" a thing are not legally the same thing. The Cabal could still legally "own Mars" and not have operational input ("strings cut")..
ah, the legal sorcery angle. i can write some words on paper too.
what happens when two cultures with conflicting legal opinions collide?
war.
what happens to the verdicts and contracts of the defeated side?
they're just history. so does anybody care, other than historians?
would that make Mars 'unceded territory'? 😂
cabals legal tricks will work for them as long as God allows them to, but they are just that... tricks.
I am by no means convinced that it is up to the Divine. On the contrary, I think it is very much up to us. Regardless, their tricks are still the law of the land, which means they are still the beliefs of the masses, which means they are still as real as a thing gets within the construct of society, which is the only place where the concept of "ownership" means anything at all.
Until the beliefs change, it is what it is.
true, it's up to us. I only bring God into this because that's the real owner of it all.
I'm not sure if that's true at all. The Source of All Things is the Source. There is nothing that is not already, and eternally, fundamentally connected to Source. The concept of "ownership" doesn't really apply in any meaningful (distinctive) way.
Ownership is a construct of the individual person (this piece of bread is mine, this fishing pole is mine, etc.), and by extension a social construct (we agree the bread is yours, we disagree about the fishing pole, etc.). It doesn't really have meaning outside of those scopes.