I get into trouble sometimes for suggesting that certain people might be playing a role for good. BUT this movie is so clever it is hard not to be open to the thought at this stage.
Yah. People too easily forget that this is a psywar. Normies are MEANT to have a certain viewpoint to build public opinion, but anons are meant to be thinking and observing on different level.
First and foremost, we really should NOT simply be taking things at face value, and understand that the whole public sphere is awash with narratives and psyops. Looking at the net effects that a person's actions have is a far more effective way of getting to the core than just looking at what they SEEM like.
But just because people can come to a conclusion about someone playing a role or not doesn't make it true, and so discussion should never be shut down on the premise of whether someone is good/bad/etc.
I'm not really sure where the "but" comes from, because I could not agree with you more. No sincere discussion motivated n good faith needs to be or should be shut down. The only exception would be if it is off-topic.
Sorry, I just mean that some people will take that to mean that because X number of people believe Y person is working for white hats means that you can't disagree with that.
I don't buy that Pence is, for example, though some even still remain adamant he is. Which is fine, ultimately we don't know specifics.
I do hope the people playing the bad guys are honored for their personal sacrifice down the line though.
Two things I will find more interesting than anything else: What happened to allow us to win the 2016 Election, and also, what "DS" actors have actually been White Hats this whole time.
I get into trouble sometimes for suggesting that certain people might be playing a role for good. BUT this movie is so clever it is hard not to be open to the thought at this stage.
Yah. People too easily forget that this is a psywar. Normies are MEANT to have a certain viewpoint to build public opinion, but anons are meant to be thinking and observing on different level.
First and foremost, we really should NOT simply be taking things at face value, and understand that the whole public sphere is awash with narratives and psyops. Looking at the net effects that a person's actions have is a far more effective way of getting to the core than just looking at what they SEEM like.
But just because people can come to a conclusion about someone playing a role or not doesn't make it true, and so discussion should never be shut down on the premise of whether someone is good/bad/etc.
I'm not really sure where the "but" comes from, because I could not agree with you more. No sincere discussion motivated n good faith needs to be or should be shut down. The only exception would be if it is off-topic.
Sorry, I just mean that some people will take that to mean that because X number of people believe Y person is working for white hats means that you can't disagree with that.
I don't buy that Pence is, for example, though some even still remain adamant he is. Which is fine, ultimately we don't know specifics.
I do hope the people playing the bad guys are honored for their personal sacrifice down the line though.
Two things I will find more interesting than anything else: What happened to allow us to win the 2016 Election, and also, what "DS" actors have actually been White Hats this whole time.
I'm with you. I'm not suggesting he won illegitimately. I'm saying I want the story on how they (us) beat the rigging that year.