The House vote to hold Merrick Garland in Inherent Contempt just FAILED
(twitter.com)
đź–•TREASON! đź–•
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
THIS is NOT the JUSTICE phase. This is the EXPOSURE phase to wake people up. Anyone expecting different results at this point in time is not seeing the BIG picture.
Justice phase is when 1/2 of Congress is in gitmo. The voting will go much smoother then
ONLY 1/2 ?. Research Assange, 5% of good guy,s is more real. Q suggests many will disappear because the truth of the level of corruption.
Hang them all
Agree
I would much prefer swinging in the wind for 24 hours; then feeding the birds for a day.
Then ceremoniously dumped in a ditch, buried and a memorial to Traitors of the American United States in a monument covered in Porta Potties, so the America People can do to them, what they spent their lives doing to us.
I'm loosing my mind trying to explain this to my mom. She is so close to understanding but keeps pulling back.
Ivermectin may help. Sadly, not kidding...
How so, in this case?
They are attacking our brains through multiple vectors-chemical, biological & EMF/nanotechnology. From the biological vector, I've caught comments regarding parasitic micro worms (toxoplasma gondi?) that may be able to network and work as a larger organism to affect the brain of the host. This could help explain why the LGBT folks don't dwindle out of evolutionary existence. For nanotechnology and other items, see this video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cTtIPBPSv0U&feature=youtu.be
That's a great point. Exposure. Then justice.
ABSOLUTELY! Take some time off and watch some crime shows! Expose the crime then convict the ....
Agreed.
Then, there is also the question of whether Merrick Garland is who the deep state thinks he is, and whether he's doing exactly what the deep state wants him to do.
Optically, he gets bashed, just as DJT bashes Sleepy Joe, but the DOJ under Garland has also been advancing other behind the scenes issues, like tackling trafficking, child and otherwise.
Trump said some curious and interesting things about Garland. "I thought he was a great guy. Maybe his or maybe he isn't. I guess we'll see" (not verbatim, but that's the gist of it).
I get into trouble sometimes for suggesting that certain people might be playing a role for good. BUT this movie is so clever it is hard not to be open to the thought at this stage.
Yah. People too easily forget that this is a psywar. Normies are MEANT to have a certain viewpoint to build public opinion, but anons are meant to be thinking and observing on different level.
First and foremost, we really should NOT simply be taking things at face value, and understand that the whole public sphere is awash with narratives and psyops. Looking at the net effects that a person's actions have is a far more effective way of getting to the core than just looking at what they SEEM like.
But just because people can come to a conclusion about someone playing a role or not doesn't make it true, and so discussion should never be shut down on the premise of whether someone is good/bad/etc.
Two things I will find more interesting than anything else: What happened to allow us to win the 2016 Election, and also, what "DS" actors have actually been White Hats this whole time.
What happened was the DNC insisted on forcing through a candidate that had already been rebuffed by primary voters and ran her against someone with actual popular support.
I knew plenty of people who were happy to vote for the “first female president” who also had the letter next to her name that they liked - very very few of them actually LIKED Clinton as a person or a candidate. They just kind of shrugged at the forcefeeding and accepted it because hey woman and also she had the correct letter. I met maybe two people in 2016 who were EXCITED about voting for Clinton for anything besides “the historic nature” of it.
Actually, fuck, I say that, but I can’t even pull up the two people. I may not have met anyone, and I was doing the con circuit and meeting all sorts of folks that year.
But I am sure we both met many people who were FERVENT with excitement for Trump that year.
That’s why he won. He was the better, stronger candidate who had a more realistic vision of America as it is, and his opponents could not for the life of them see that.
I understand.