WAY TO GO!. We ALL have to stop supporting woke company,s anyway! I have supported local greengrocers ,butchers, tailors etc etc all my life. BUT NOW we must ruin and replace ALL the cabal owned enterprises.
"X" can't be classified as a "free speech platform." Musk had it headed in that direction, but then made the stupid decision to hire WEF-grad Vaccarino as CEO.
Then how does Rumble pay to exist? It can't be free. And advertisers aren't going to pay anything for ads that don't get seen until a follow up video. What is the viewer doesn't complete the first video or never starts a second?
I got rid of cable in 2018 and I watch a ton of YouTube and there's a crazy amount of ads. So I'm not sure what you mean by "it's free"? The ads pay for it. Just like Rumble. The only way a platform could afford to exist without ads is if they charged viewers to view instead.
And probably that's the only way to have true "freedom of speech" is if no advertisers exist who could threaten to pull ads if they aren't happy with content.
WAY TO GO!. We ALL have to stop supporting woke company,s anyway! I have supported local greengrocers ,butchers, tailors etc etc all my life. BUT NOW we must ruin and replace ALL the cabal owned enterprises.
But they can't implement a search function that would make rumble worth using in the first place? Rumble sucks golf balls thru garden hoses.
the search does blow. I'm all in with them anyhow. Stock was cheap so I took the leap. Go RUM !
"X" can't be classified as a "free speech platform." Musk had it headed in that direction, but then made the stupid decision to hire WEF-grad Vaccarino as CEO.
That was highly suspect. He could have hired from a of qualified people who arent WEF stooges
I have always thought that
Rumble is trash though, can’t believe how bad it is. Why not just spend money on basic things like updating UI and performance?
As long as this isn't another $5 a bottle gimmick water or something I'm interested.
I have 150 guitar lessons on Rumble.
Each lesson is under a minute long.
It takes the viewer longer to watch the commercials than to watch the guitar lesson.
Not a very good ROI for viewers.
Why not let the viewer watch the video for free, THEN put up an ad for the 2nd video?
Nobody is going to watch my videos if they have to put up with TWO fn ads each time.
Then how does Rumble pay to exist? It can't be free. And advertisers aren't going to pay anything for ads that don't get seen until a follow up video. What is the viewer doesn't complete the first video or never starts a second?
How does YouTube let you watch a video for free.
The reason i havent watched TV in 15 years is because theres too many commercials. Not worth my time. And look at TV viewership to see im not alone
Love your name. We so agree on that 💯
I got rid of cable in 2018 and I watch a ton of YouTube and there's a crazy amount of ads. So I'm not sure what you mean by "it's free"? The ads pay for it. Just like Rumble. The only way a platform could afford to exist without ads is if they charged viewers to view instead. And probably that's the only way to have true "freedom of speech" is if no advertisers exist who could threaten to pull ads if they aren't happy with content.
Mint snuff... good snuff...
/OurGuy