I dont know about the rest of you but i havnt seen a word about the need for gun control after the attempt at Trumps life. Usually after a shooting theres a wave of voices screaming to enact new gun control laws. I wonder why the dems would choose to ignore that talking point in this specific situation. Hmmmm hmmmm i wonder
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Simple they want to distance them selfs from the shooter/event. Why? He was doing work for them. Hence the FB ban lift and MSM actually covering a Trump rally. They needed the head shot live streamed.
They are now doing the Homer Simpson fade into the bushes thing now.
That is a great comment! And perfect visual.
That would be an extremely important point. Were the MSM, FB live streaming and was it out of character for them to do it.
When they decide to take out one of their own (and I think we know who that'll be) and blame it on MAGA, you will see them screaming gun control 24/7.
Exactly!! Wish I could upvote this more. This just opened the pathway for them to get Biden out of the race whether he wants to or not.
I would bet those involved are too busy running for cover and trying to disappear.
Remember, only 20% is public. Imagine the 80% right now that we can't see.
Maybe the ploy was to strike fear into the rinos so they'd lead the charge on an 'assault weapons' ban. Hell, we'll have to see how Trump's opinion on gun rights have been affected by this.
Why would Trump's opinion change? You really think getting shot at by some loony fed soy boy is going to scare Trump into violating the constitution?
Do I needs to remind you about the bump stock ban?
You don't need a bump stock to bump fire, it just makes it easier, and besides, who's appointees overturned that bumpstock ban anyways?
Automatic weapons are already banned unless you have a permit. Trying to find middle ground and gain new support is not the same as a kneejerk reaction and calling for actual gun control that the left wants.
Very interesting and definitely a first