They’re pushing another pasty
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
I think Oswald himself said that he was a patsy. And that he didn't shoot. So maybe he "didn't act alone" but he didn't act at all but was simply made into the fall guy. Sirhan Sirhan definitely did shoot, but most likely didn't work alone, and there could have been another shooter besides everything done to make him go there and shoot. James Earl Ray, either involved or a mere fall guy, confessed to avoid death sentence, then spend rest of his life trying to withdraw that confession. Crooks, well, who knows.
True, most of these "lone gunmen" don't exactly look as if they were clear cases. And yes, even the fact that it always seems to be a "lone gunman" these days is suspicious. Was Lincoln's assassination the last one when they actually found a political conspiracy to kill him, and everything after that has been claimed to be just "lone gunmen"?
Kind of what i came here to say. I thought everyone knew Oswald was a patsy killed by Jack Ruby.
JFK was assassinated by the CIA possibly with the help of the secret service.
If Oswald was one of two or more shooters, he never would have said he was a patsy.
The only way "patsy" makes sense is if he was not a shooter at all.
And someone saw him in the cafeteria within moments of the shooting, and he could not have had the time to get there.
The real shots came from across the street in the Dal-Tex building, which if you go there today, is closed to the public.
Of course, grassy knoll guy was also a shooter, and maybe a guy in front, as well.