2nd shooter theory
(twitter.com)
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Which is exactly why this was supposed to mirror ( there's that word again ) the JFK hit.
As per usual,!!!! Right ??? The trigger dies & the brains/ planner behind the scene walks away, ..,free dang!
Second shooter was aiming at the guy in the bleachers and not Trump!
This. Ballistics evidence. All those phones.
More will come out as people review what they captured.
Problem is this guy is doing his presentations behind a Paytriot Paywall & putting up these images to draw people there. If you are gonna present this type of evidence it needs to be out in the open. I have seen him put out several trajectories that just make no sense. How do we know these people were hit by bullets & not just ducking? Where is the snipers perch? Yeah if the trajectory comes from Water Tower to person in crowd who was proveably hit & in line with Trump or another reasonable target, it might make sense, but trajectory lines going off from nowhere without an identiable legitimate target & a rational explaination unless you go to this site & pay him for it just serves to confuse & distract from the facts. He says the bullet hit 2 people & passed across an entire bleacher without anyone else getting hit & striking a railing just strains credibility to the breaking point. If he was legit, it would be out there in the open with evidence to back it up to get the truth out just like he did with Las Vegas, not behind a paywall on Patreon.
I see now that Cullen says the second angle target was the Counter Snipers. One would think the Primary Target would have had a greater import at the time. https://x.com/I_Am_JohnCullen/status/1813431790352146822
Not if the pray HAD to eat the blame 🤷🏻♂️ I don’t know, just saying, we may never truly find out.
Well I have my own theories, but I see no need to give voice to them since the Media is suddenly putting pressure on those it should & Libs are getting canned for their sick posts. Best leave well enough alone...
I presented what I’ve found for discussion. That’s what this is for, is it not? Have we not seen pretty sketchy, baseless claims form the Chans about a body swap? There very little to no basis for that either..
And, I discussed my belief on what I saw. I'm just surprised Cullin isn't presenting his methodology & evidence in detail in open forum as he did with Vegas instead of like this..Got a lot of respect for his ability from his previous work, but what I see from him here is lacking a rational explaination. That puff of smoke by the railing could be a pyro blank discharge going off under the bunting for all we know...not that I'm saying that is what it was.
Looking glass more likely, and that they knew an attempt would be made (maybe not this day but at some point) but that the attempt would fail. At that point you put on the full armor of God and you carry on with the business of draining the swamp.
Everything seems like a stretch at first, fren
How would the second shooter miss so badly, though?
Or, was he trying to hit someone else in the bleachers?
He was aiming for the sniper
Aiming for the sniper on the roof
I have one question. Since modern ammunition is smokeless… what are we seeing?
I did see a video of bullets hitting the hand rail..
I think that was the hand rail ricochet.
Looks like it hit the railing, so my guess is a combination of dislodged paint/dust and fragments of the bullet.
Regardless of smokeless gunpowder or not, the smoke does not travel with the bullet, it only travels like 10-20 feet from the barrel of the gun depending on what you're shooting. (Even smokeless still has smoke, just less)
No idea. Just found it interesting (and who knows if it’s altered) 🤷🏻♂️
This is why I posted earlier asking if anyone has info on the bullets' trajectories.
Not a shooter…. Hydraulic fluid spraying because errant round.