I'm confident now that it's Crooks and not Yearick based on the shirt and side pic captured of Crooks at the rally. I didn't realize that picture which was posted and then deleted on Twitter, was more than likely a picture of Crooks on camera they had captured as they were watching him. It's the same shirt as the dead shooter pic showing the sleeve flag and you can see the grey shirt in the dead face pic.
Also, Crooks was in a Blackrock video, which makes it look very plausible that he was in contact with the kind of people who would be interested in recruiting someone to take part in an assassination.
You also have Crooks father alerting authorities that his AR was missing as well as his son and he was worried some 2 hours or so before the event.
Could there be more to this than just him of course; but I do believe the neutralized perp on the roof was in fact Crooks
Hard not to argue with you; I do see some similarities, especially ear gauge sewn up. I just wonder can anyone verify when and where Yearick was last seen?
To your point though either way we can't definitely say one way or another. I still side with Crooks but my mind is open to it could also be Yearick.
Good stuff. I’ve noticed most people don’t really care about the shooter. It’s as if he was just the tool used. Most are pointing to the police, CIA, SS, cabal, Democrat leaders.
Depends on the platform. Some anons focus on one thing while others focus on another. Gotta spread it around. No one person can focus on every aspect of an investigation. And considering we are in the middle of the largest investigation of all time, and battling those involved that are trying to keep the truth hidden, the more people that focus on one potential aspect, the better the outcome will be.
I'd bet that there are some anons that are compiling all the info somewhere that aren't even posting about it. Then when everything seems to be coming together, those people will come out with an amazing investigative report. Patience, grasshopper.
The man who was fatally shot behind Trump was far back to the left (if facing Trump), nowhere near the line of fire from Crook/Yearick’s position. So either Crook/Yearick jerked his gun that far over to the left after the first shot, or that shot whizzed through from a different direction.
I think the dead man was a decoy. They kill him. Then they push the lone shooter bit. Then they hope that it is a good enough reason to not investigate further. Lame, but then they really aren't that smart, just desperate.
Maxwell Yearick still makes more sense to me.
I'm confident now that it's Crooks and not Yearick based on the shirt and side pic captured of Crooks at the rally. I didn't realize that picture which was posted and then deleted on Twitter, was more than likely a picture of Crooks on camera they had captured as they were watching him. It's the same shirt as the dead shooter pic showing the sleeve flag and you can see the grey shirt in the dead face pic.
Also, Crooks was in a Blackrock video, which makes it look very plausible that he was in contact with the kind of people who would be interested in recruiting someone to take part in an assassination.
You also have Crooks father alerting authorities that his AR was missing as well as his son and he was worried some 2 hours or so before the event.
Could there be more to this than just him of course; but I do believe the neutralized perp on the roof was in fact Crooks
Hard not to argue with you; I do see some similarities, especially ear gauge sewn up. I just wonder can anyone verify when and where Yearick was last seen?
To your point though either way we can't definitely say one way or another. I still side with Crooks but my mind is open to it could also be Yearick.
I say Yearick. Look at the details of the foreheads.
Live bread if anyone wants to add: https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/474598762#p474605038
Thanks bb!
Good stuff. I’ve noticed most people don’t really care about the shooter. It’s as if he was just the tool used. Most are pointing to the police, CIA, SS, cabal, Democrat leaders.
Depends on the platform. Some anons focus on one thing while others focus on another. Gotta spread it around. No one person can focus on every aspect of an investigation. And considering we are in the middle of the largest investigation of all time, and battling those involved that are trying to keep the truth hidden, the more people that focus on one potential aspect, the better the outcome will be.
I'd bet that there are some anons that are compiling all the info somewhere that aren't even posting about it. Then when everything seems to be coming together, those people will come out with an amazing investigative report. Patience, grasshopper.
The man who was fatally shot behind Trump was far back to the left (if facing Trump), nowhere near the line of fire from Crook/Yearick’s position. So either Crook/Yearick jerked his gun that far over to the left after the first shot, or that shot whizzed through from a different direction.
Assassination was planned but maybe the dead man was another assassination. Who would want hid dead?
I think the dead man was a decoy. They kill him. Then they push the lone shooter bit. Then they hope that it is a good enough reason to not investigate further. Lame, but then they really aren't that smart, just desperate.
I'm starting to get ashli babbit vibes about this, iykyk.
Yep. Imagine that.
Same playbook.
Pastebin dump:
https://pastebin.com/SUp2yAiZ
https://files.catbox.moe/2qxo02.jpeg
😂 I, too, have carried an AR-15, a backpack, and a 12 foot 🪜 for 1 mile
Thanks for the link, BB. Very much appreciated.
That one picture captured the Path of the Bullet, shows a much flatter angle that would have been F there was a second shooter on the Water Tower....
Just sitting here pointing out the more Obvious things....