The coincidences oh the coincidences.
Last week it was discovered that austin capital might have opened a 120m short options position on Trumps stock (DJT) the day before the assassination...
This has started to make national news and then austin capital comes out to deflect by sayig its a filing error... ok... guess we will have to trust our 3 letter agents to determine truth on that. The anons digging also linked them to the Bush family.
But then there's Doug Mills. Doug also has connections to the Bush family and was the man responsible for photographing Bush in the elementary school the day of the 911 attack. Doug is the photographer who was at the Trump rally and caught the bullet streaked photo.
Any optical engineer or professional photographer, such as Doug Mills knows this photo taken is very suspicious... why would Doug Mills be at a Trump rally and have a camera capturing that many frames per second? First a high speed camera that can capture a bullet traveling at 3000 feet per second is not something you would be usig at a Trump rally. The exposure time of that speed would drown out the light and be useless to capture still photos. It would also fill any memory card up so quickly with over exposed garbage photos.
Maybe Doug is just a stupid photographer... or maybe he knew and was expecting the photo of Trump's head explodig, to seed everywhere and literally start a civil war.
Im sure META had no knowledge of it either, which is why Trumps FB account magically is unbanned the day before so all those who use FB could see the coincidental Doug Mills photo being tagged for DJT to really piss folks off.
Anyways... im sure we just have a big coincidence here and shouldn't look at it as anything but that. ,(Sarcasm)
Doubt they would tell him EXACTLY what is up, he is just their trusted GOTO guy. He doesnt ask questions, his works get promoted and he lives a comfortable life as one of their servants.
I mean we are talking about about NYT, as DS mouthpiece.
He doesnt have to be explicitly told details of 9/11 or the Assasination attempt or whatever he is sent to cover, just to be sure to focus on Trump at a certain time.
Just seems odds they send their TOP GUY to this ordinary rally and he is the ONLY camera guy to have a primo spot right in front of Trump, Seems odd they send him to take pictures of Bush reading a book to kids as well ......I might go through and view a history of his more famous picks and see if anything else looks timely.
He wasn't the only photographer. There were lots of photographers there firing off their shots in that moment. He's shots were mostly used because he probably just had the best shots.
I understand being suspicious of things right now but being suspicious of this man being there doing his job that he's been doing for decades is like being suspicious of a wedding photographer being at a wedding.
The only thing I thought was weird was his choice of using 1/8000 shutter speed for a subject who's virtually standing still. But a bunch of other photographers have chimed in here saying that's not unusual for them. It is for me, I would never shoot at 1/8000 unless I was at a sporting event. But photographers are all different and all shoot differently. So even if i find that shutter speed utterly overkill, it's simply not enough to accuse this man of knowing anything.
"I would never shoot at 1/8000 unless I was at a sporting event."
So with an fstop of 1.6 and an ISO of 50 to 100 you're telling me that wouldn't give you a proper exposure? Especially when you are trying to include a fluttering flag in the background?
I often shoot at 1.4 and it never required that high of a shutter speed. And wtf about a fluttering flag, omg you don't need 1/8000 to capture a fluttering flag, are you serious?
Yeah I'm sure you do. The exposure is proper for f1.6. Making the most uncharitable argument still isn't evidence of anything nefarious.
https://files.catbox.moe/jkjrgn.png
Didnt say he was the ONLY photog.....he was the ONLY one who had a spot in the front row right in front of Trump....somone posted a photo of his spot and you can see him in the videos as well.
And if the wedding photographer kept taking once in a lifetime type photos during unforseen tragic events at the wedding then suspicion is warranted.
He wasn't the only photog in the front right under Trump. There were several and they all were trying to get shots of a lifetime up there.
Also a wedding photographer's job is to shoot the wedding, a photojournalists job is to shoot the story, no matter what happens. That's not cause for suspicion. That's his literal job. These are the photographers who shoot wars.
look at the picture pal , I cant find it but it was posted a couple days ago and you will see other wise..he was the ONLY guy taking photos right in front of Trump
There was no shot of a lifetime, it was just Trump at a Rally ...unless you had some kind of heads up of course.
Anyway whatever.....