Texas gun nut Brandon Herrera addresses theories that the assassination attempt was staged.
(www.youtube.com)
🤔💭 Theory 😲💡
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (85)
sorted by:
I literally have no idea what you're even talking about.
You probably either misread a comment I made or are replying to someone else.
Looking back over the thread, I think I did in fact misunderstand you. It seems I thought the contexts of posts was different than it was. That doesn't happen too often to me, but looking back, it seems it happened here. Regardless of what I thought I saw, I should have been more explanatory in my first post, rather than accusatory. So even if I had been correct in my reading comprehension, I should have been more diplomatic
For all errors I want to offer my apology.
Since I made a big todo about it, I will explain what I thought I saw.
This began with the first response in this thread, where it was
Then came a very reasonable response of how and why it might have been staged, which I agreed was sensible. It turns out this response was yours, yet I very much thought your response was in opposition to this, which I'll get to.
Then came:
Which was in response to your hypothetical in support of it, and then came a response that I thought was in opposition to this supporting response:
This sounds to me like you are chastising, and calling unhinged, anyone who is not focusing on the "honor and reverence deserved by the firefighter and his family."
Since any idea of this being a staged event has some moral difficulties to deal with regarding the death, or potential death, of the firefighter, such a castigation suggests that we should not be entertaining these ideas because it neglects the "deserved respect". In other words, that the thing that must be focused on is the respect of the firefighter, and if you entertain any other ideas, you are unhinged and should stfu.
I will now admit that I responded to this sentence without reading the rest of the post it was contained in. It was late, I was tired, and I have heard so many times in the past few days how we shouldn't be talking about this, mostly because of the death of the firefighter.
I got fed up, and I took it out on you, even though in full context of what you said, I do not now think you deserved it at all. On the contrary, I fully agree with you.
I have since edited my first post to include my misunderstanding.
Again, I apologize.
When I said
My context was that any democrat who denies that the firefighter and his family deserve honor would come off as unhinged.
Specifically, Destiny and all the unhinged democrats on social media commenting that it was a set-up came to mind.
It is devastating to the left, and counter-productive for Q followers, to entertain that the shooting was staged.
If this hypothetical became common knowledge, it would negate Trump's 10-point spike which could add a couple more swing states and create an even larger landslide.
But I'm ok with talking about it because I don't think most people would agree with me and I won't convince enough people to have that happen.
In my mind, Q would never let Trump be in a situation with that lax of security. Q would never allow Trump to have a SS detail provided and managed by the Biden administration. With that understanding, this being a Q psyop is the only thing that makes sense to me.
All is good, thanks for the reply!
I agree completely, the level of incompetence required by Q to let this happen would make Q a liar. More, it seems that pretty much everyone there and their neighbor's grandmother seems to have seen it coming minutes or even hours before it happened. That makes Q not only a liar, but a LARP. There is far too much evidence against either LARP or liar. Therefore there must be another explanation.
But that's only part of the story. There are also numerous Q posts that support this being a psyop. Indeed, it lines up so well, there are several new Q proofs in there that are among the strongest that exist.
I actually think I could make a very convincing case for this being a Q psy-op. Enough that I could sway all but the "most certain" (and the glowies). However:
This has held me back from making that post, or even really pursuing comments in threads like this. Yes, I think that the truth is that this was a Q psyop. Nothing makes a lick of sense otherwise, and a ton of sense if it is.
Q may be all about the pursuit of truth, but it is even more about bringing about necessary changes in our understanding of the reality we live in, and ultimately, the GA.
I don't need to pursue this. There are obvious negatives if I make too convincing of an argument. There are plenty of others that think it's a psyop, but it is counter-productive to pursue it. A false flag event is a bomb blowing up in your face if it fails. I don't want this to fail. People don't need to know this was a false flag. No one who didn't have an excellent grasp of the Q posts could possibly make a convincing case. So outside of one of us, there aren't really any people who could jeopardize the false flag.
Anyone who could make a sufficiently convincing case is also someone who would realize that this event wasn't about the election, it was about saving the planet from 10,000 years of darkness (past and future). There are so many parallels and connections with JFK and 911 that all sorts of people are re-examining those events in a new light. This was a major wake up event because of those connections. Ultimately, this event was about preventing the end of the human race, or perhaps really it's beginning, depending on how you look at it.
For those reason, I have decided to leave this one alone. The choice to know belongs to those who wish to know. The world doesn't need to know, especially not now.