Watching the linked video, at 5:34, I was trying to get a sense of the features of the face. In particular from when he was on the roof. I got suspicious when in the only side shot of Crooks I've seen his head and chin were down below the rifle. Hmm.
So convince me they didn't highly train the shooter, and kidnap and make disappear a likealike kid known to love guns from a lefty point of view.
All they'd have to do is pass off fake DNA tests, control the imagery and get the parents to shut up. By the way, the supposed drone shot of the side of his face and chin 11:17, are we sure of the date and location? So they had drones?
It seems to me, If it was crooks, his chin was awfully more poignant.
How people change in just a few years.
But notice the prop: Knowing history and interest in guns. It leads suddenly to an outburst of violence. O and you should not exhibit calm demeanor. Very suspect.
Can't argue with you, IDGAF about the Blackrock connection, but their commercial provided much needed images of Crooks. I don't honestly see a match with the guy on the roof.
Tell the truth, I didn't even look at the images that closely... and believe your analysis is most likely correct. Sorry to miss the point of your post....Keep digging in spite of me!!
Just consider the possibility that all information is false and you can begin to see how it might all be sleight of hand.
Then you can work out how they did it.
Something is fucky and the longer it goes without being exposed the more likely it gets memoryholed and covered up
Watching the linked video, at 5:34, I was trying to get a sense of the features of the face. In particular from when he was on the roof. I got suspicious when in the only side shot of Crooks I've seen his head and chin were down below the rifle. Hmm.
So convince me they didn't highly train the shooter, and kidnap and make disappear a likealike kid known to love guns from a lefty point of view.
All they'd have to do is pass off fake DNA tests, control the imagery and get the parents to shut up. By the way, the supposed drone shot of the side of his face and chin 11:17, are we sure of the date and location? So they had drones?
They might have screamed, but they didn't 'push to get out.' You can clearly see in the video how everybody stayed in place. It was amazing, really.
Black rock recruited him through mk
It seems to me, If it was crooks, his chin was awfully more poignant.
How people change in just a few years.
But notice the prop: Knowing history and interest in guns. It leads suddenly to an outburst of violence. O and you should not exhibit calm demeanor. Very suspect.
I watched the whole thing. What a bunch of propaganda. I think it is a Blackrock/DNC commercial. Just my opinion.
Can't argue with you, IDGAF about the Blackrock connection, but their commercial provided much needed images of Crooks. I don't honestly see a match with the guy on the roof.
Tell the truth, I didn't even look at the images that closely... and believe your analysis is most likely correct. Sorry to miss the point of your post....Keep digging in spite of me!!
Yearick was the shooter. Crooks looked enough like him that it would work.
King Luxury.
Robo voice.
31k down votes.
I'm sure this will be credible.