The main problem I am having here is the fact that you can no longer trust photos much. The photo we are given as being of the dead guy on the roof could easily be older, that of somebody who died in a situation completely unrelated to this and used now because it was easy to pass as the roof shooter and it hasn't been in the public before so you would not find it online, and altered just enough - the ear - to make it look like Crooks.
Or not. Maybe it is what it is claimed to be. It's just damn hard to trust anything given of that whole thing now because there are too many holes in the story.
The main problem I am having here is the fact that you can no longer trust photos much. The photo we are given as being of the dead guy on the roof could easily be older, that of somebody who died in a situation completely unrelated to this and used now because it was easy to pass as the roof shooter and it hasn't been in the public before so you would not find it online, and altered just enough - the ear - to make it look like Crooks.
Or not. Maybe it is what it is claimed to be. It's just damn hard to trust anything given of that whole thing now because there are too many holes in the story.
Right I agree it's hard.