Probably to align his line of sight/shot flight path with the bullets that actually came from the water tower. Or the open window in the adjacent building.
I don't know what really happened, of course. But I am confident that the story we are being told now is, at best, not accurate. And at worst an intentional fraud.
I hear you, but I saw some video of the water tower that was quite blurry, but definitely looked like it had a man on the top, right at the time of the shooting.
Probably to align his line of sight/shot flight path with the bullets that actually came from the water tower. Or the open window in the adjacent building.
I don't know what really happened, of course. But I am confident that the story we are being told now is, at best, not accurate. And at worst an intentional fraud.
I'm 99.9% inclined to go with the latter
I hear you, but I saw some video of the water tower that was quite blurry, but definitely looked like it had a man on the top, right at the time of the shooting.
Slope-y roof, grassy knoll, second shooter, ya never know.