The leading theory is some kind of planned demolition. I would advise people to not fall into the planes/no-planes debate (it's a red herring), but focus on the collapse of WTC1, WTC2, & especially WTC7. These are all suspicious because of WTC7 being the smoking gun for the leading theory.
If anyone wants to focus on planes.. the focus should be on how little energy they contained, which is far less than what would have been required to bring WTC1/2 down to rubble to the very base floor as we saw.
It would be another piece to the criminal puzzle (planes/no-planes) but we aren't at that discussion point yet. We have evidence of explosions and leading theories on it, and research to debunk the official NIST declaration. But there's blockers and gatekeepers in powerful positions, preventing any correction. This is where the battle is now. Unblock so the investigation can be truly done.. but we also have almost 25 years since, so its likely a lot of things have been destroyed to prevent criminal investigation.
I’d love to to have anything you have , I red pilled many using 911 ,, when will America stop eating the lies that they feed them .,I’m so grateful I questioned everything even as a young person . Been awake longer then I can remember ,,
Yeah, because in order to discuss the matter without encountering personal attacks, cognitive dissonance, or rejection, you have to first pierce the thick programmed propaganda with the concept that WTC7 is out of place and that planes alone couldn't have caused the damage. Without having that concept being accepted as "valid or curious enough to warrant further investigation", you simply won't be able to progress to CGI aircraft. I know, because this is the path I followed to wake up.
Yeah debating the no plane theory is just a dead end, the relevant facts are that the buildings were CLEARLY professionally demolished and the planes had nothing to do with the collapses.
I wouldn't be surprised at all to find there were no planes but it's not necessary for waking normies.
The collapses are where the focus should be for us
1000's of people on the ground saw the planes hit. There's countless videos of people looking up at the planes, pointing at them as they fly overhead. Telling their eye witness account of seeing the planes.
Literally, all the people in Manhattan would have to be a part of this. Just silly.
Forget about the planes and focus on how the buildings turned to powder on the way down. Steel beams also. The seismic activity that day should have looked like it was raining dumptrucks but it's nominal
The leading theory is some kind of planned demolition. I would advise people to not fall into the planes/no-planes debate (it's a red herring), but focus on the collapse of WTC1, WTC2, & especially WTC7. These are all suspicious because of WTC7 being the smoking gun for the leading theory.
If anyone wants to focus on planes.. the focus should be on how little energy they contained, which is far less than what would have been required to bring WTC1/2 down to rubble to the very base floor as we saw.
if there were proven to be no planes, that would be a red herring?
It would be another piece to the criminal puzzle (planes/no-planes) but we aren't at that discussion point yet. We have evidence of explosions and leading theories on it, and research to debunk the official NIST declaration. But there's blockers and gatekeepers in powerful positions, preventing any correction. This is where the battle is now. Unblock so the investigation can be truly done.. but we also have almost 25 years since, so its likely a lot of things have been destroyed to prevent criminal investigation.
the no planes proof is archived... lemme know when ya want it
I’d love to to have anything you have , I red pilled many using 911 ,, when will America stop eating the lies that they feed them .,I’m so grateful I questioned everything even as a young person . Been awake longer then I can remember ,,
when we get to needing to discuss it, after we begin to fix the lies surrounding the event.
Yeah, because in order to discuss the matter without encountering personal attacks, cognitive dissonance, or rejection, you have to first pierce the thick programmed propaganda with the concept that WTC7 is out of place and that planes alone couldn't have caused the damage. Without having that concept being accepted as "valid or curious enough to warrant further investigation", you simply won't be able to progress to CGI aircraft. I know, because this is the path I followed to wake up.
Yeah debating the no plane theory is just a dead end, the relevant facts are that the buildings were CLEARLY professionally demolished and the planes had nothing to do with the collapses.
I wouldn't be surprised at all to find there were no planes but it's not necessary for waking normies.
The collapses are where the focus should be for us
🎯
1000's of people on the ground saw the planes hit. There's countless videos of people looking up at the planes, pointing at them as they fly overhead. Telling their eye witness account of seeing the planes.
Literally, all the people in Manhattan would have to be a part of this. Just silly.
So even if the planes are real they still wouldnt have brought down buildings like that. Planned demolition is still most probable
I think planned demolition was certain.
Not arguing that. But to say there were no planes is kooksville. All credibility is lost.
Are there any eyewitness accounts of seeing it explode with no planes?
Is that impossible? Remember the show where a dance flash mob coordinated to surprise 1 person. Crisis actors....
The plane struck the far side of the building.
This is the correct answer.
Keep it simple, stay out of the weeds.
There are many singular arguments that cannot be reconciled.
There is no getting past the "Nose Out Shot."
There is no getting past "Building 7."
There is no getting past the "Synchronized Explosions."
💯
Forget about the planes and focus on how the buildings turned to powder on the way down. Steel beams also. The seismic activity that day should have looked like it was raining dumptrucks but it's nominal
💯
There's been footage of unmarked plain white planes flying into the twin towers. I've seen the footage before YouTube pulled it.
Plain white unmarked planes are in keeping with the CIA drones theory.
The buildings themselves were brought down by carefully rigged demolition explosives. Every other floor was rigged.
💯