NEVER FORGET: JET FUEL MELT STEEL BEAMS BUT NOT PASSPORT PAPER
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (194)
sorted by:
https://youtu.be/PcKlPhFIE7w?si=lXUZS2-bRKLddUhV
Listen to Trump on 9-11
He says the Towers had the steel beams on outside of building, that planes couldn’t have penetrated the narrow windows, and that bombs were used.
Trump came as close to saying the airframes had been assembled at the CIA boneyard using Tungsten alloy without saying it. But he knew how they did it, and they knew he knew.
I’m looking for other Trump interviews, I think there is a better one from a few days after 9-11.
https://youtu.be/ZYXygIcIJ6I?si=O-X1IFvVv0OUr2vb
Trump talks windows: https://youtu.be/8US9mgIYuC8?si=Pdd3mIMt2I0o49xK
The plane "penetrated" the windows in the same way that a potato penetrates a french-fry slicer: in strips. I've seen a computer simulation of the event. It is horrifying. Trump may know his buildings, but he doesn't build airplanes.. And it is absolutely ridiculous to think that they could have been made from tungsten, a metal nearly twice as heavy as lead.
LOL computer simulations....like the propaganda film from NIST that shows how BLDG 7 had some small fires on a few floors , wasnt even hit by a plane so no magic JET FUEL.yet somehow STILL collapsed just like a controlled demolition.
Cmon man ,first ping pong balls through cardboard now the potato slicer comparison.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc
Because it is analogous. Building 7 appears to have had a central fire as well, but the walls collapsed inward. You ought to realize that there is no logic in claiming the Twin Towers and Building 7 fell in precisely the say way for the same causes.
Ping pong balls through cardboard? Never heard of that. But the plane's structure was not as solid as the columns of the Twin Towers, so the plane would be the one to suffer the most severe deformations and shredding.
" But the plane's structure was not as solid as the columns of the Twin Towers, so the plane would be the one to suffer the most severe deformations and shredding."
Yeah no kidding.......but instead it cut through the steel like butter with nary a deformation or shredding in site
https://i.postimg.cc/5yVvxKjf/slowmo-plane-tower.gif
The potato thing is sooooo ridiculous. Here is a potato slicer, it works because the blades are super thin and there is nothiing to "catch" the potato
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc
The blade provides the resistance needed to cut the potato when pushed through, the potato doesnt destroy the blades
It cant BOTH penetrate in strips AND destroy the steel at the same time.
https://i.postimg.cc/W415V3C5/zz.png
https://i.postimg.cc/nzsTsWH7/zzz.png
Steel columns will simply rip through aluminum skins. They don't have to be sharp. And the drag force of doing this will cause failure of the columns.
LOL .....okay to the drag force of aluminum causing column failure.
https://postimg.cc/zyZBfnyh
It damn sure isnt a plane cutting through steel as if were butter.....Newtons Law of Motion crosses that one out......please look at how easily aluminum planes are damaged in a crash, you will NEVER see anything like what happened on 9/11, just like you will NEVER find a steel tower that collapsed on itself due to fire.
Oh thank you. This is amazing.
We see you handshake trying to inject phony physics over here
https://i.postimg.cc/zG3R075x/plane-twin-tower.gif
https://i.postimg.cc/5ydw2S35/Screenshot-2024-07-26-at-11-08-38-9-11-PLANES-HOAX-A-plane-does-not-pass-through-steel-concrete.png
It was flying so fast it literally melted THROUGH the steel. Science.
Bro that was a ping pong ball through cardboard and aluminum...there is NO physics that makes aluminum cut throught the thick steel guage of the Towers....Trump said it himself
You cant break steel with Aluminum fella.
Cant tell if you are a shill being obtuse or you legit think your ping pong or water pressure examples apply to a Hollowish Alluminum structure cutting through the thickest steel possible......
Trump is a builder , he doesnt need to be an engineer or physicist to understand the reality of the situation.
Breaking the steel connections is different than breaking the steel.
Those connections are designed for sheer strength to hold the weight, not for a tension side load.
I agree. When I saw the incident, I said to my coworker, "it's coming down, who is telling those firemen to go in there? Stupid fucks are going to get them killed". I've done structural construction for 47 years now (just over 20 at the time) and I know the buildings are not designed for the types of live loads the happened. I still think it was intentional and I have my own theories. I will say this now, heavy is the head that wears the crown. I think some hard decisions had to be made to cover for the Sr. Bush's evil deeds. It likely doesn't matter who the president was ot the time, same thing would have happened
All tall buildings are constructed around its elevators, it makes sense to let the elevators housings carry most of the weight
Towers were built with the load-bearing steel on the perimeter, not of the core. They were built that way specifically to withstand the impact of a commercial aircraft - what happened on 9/11 was within the design parameters of the twin towers.
A plane wing hit a light pole at O'Hare and nearly cut through the wing. How's that going to cut through 2 inch thick steel beams? https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=i72POeP2&id=E2963BEA06AEE9A283CA78997B15516AC1246946
Of course it won't.
It can't.
Just the nose and leading edge of wings and stabilizers were tungsten alloy. Rest of plane was an empty drone, remote flight control, and Stingray satellite-to-cell transmission for recorded ‘phone calls’ to loved ones. The modified airframe allowed high speed at low altitude.
Those were real planes, with real passengers on board who were killed, with real flight tracks on radar. And real residue, what little could be recovered. Your claim is an utter fantasy, making no sense whatsoever. Tungsten alloy would have no use under these conditions; the full airplane had plenty of mass and momentum to penetrate into the building.
You are an example of what a paranoid obsession can do to a mind, because your fantasy requires even more complex cover-ups and furtive maneuvers to hustle all the passengers off into obscure and secret lives---even though plenty of people were killed on the ground---where absolutely no one reveals the secret. It never stops. And you don't have any self-awareness that this obsession is not an "awakening," but a dreadful yet fondly-cherished nightmare. You want it to be true. You want it to be true so badly that you will vehemently reject reality.
My original post stated that Trump, on 9-11, comes out talking about bombs and metallurgy and structural analysis and windows; he stated that the attack was much more sophisticated than people were thinking. Trump says this within hours of the CIA crisis actor talking about metallurgy and the clown said, paraphrasing, “I just happened to see it, and obviously the fire was so intense the buildings collapsed because of the compromised integrity of the steel beams…”
don’t think commercial planes were used, but drones might have. I know the insider trading happened.
My point was that Trump went against CIA talking points from day one.
Why wouldnt they be friends at the time...2 of the Most well know building owners at the time......try harder pal.