You do know that the Shah of Iran was a globalist puppet that was inserted when they killed the guy who wanted to kick out the Rockafellers and nationalize the oil supply?
Isn't it kind of funny how the same people that tell you Russia, Russia, Russia are also telling you Iran, Iran, Iran.
Maybe it wasn't a CIA coup, but someone who kicked the globohomos out. Or do you think the Iran-Iraq war when the CIA funded and armed Sadam was just a coincidence?
You do know that the Shah of Iran was a globalist puppet that was inserted
Yes fren, hence my very specific choice of words:
because he didn’t obey them hard enough
But thanks for pointing it out. Its a testament to the general knowledgable level of this board.
when they killed the guy who wanted to kick out the Rockafellers and nationalize the oil supply?
Not sure whom you are referring to here. Afaik he took office after his father was forced to abdicate right in the middle of WW2.
Maybe it wasn't a CIA coup, but someone who kicked the globohomos out.
And this is where you would be wrong, but its excusable since it is indeed very tempting to think that the person who defeats our enemy has to be our friend. In reality, in most cases, the person defeated and the person defeating him are both pawns of the Satanists and the process itself usually part of a realignment of Cabal strategy in the region.
The switch from Shah to Khomeni was part of the transition to Petro-dollar by the Cabal as a world control system. This required centralized control of Oil and OPEC was the monopolistic structure they created for this, but Iran was not playing ball. It is explained in Iran shutdown to implement Brandt plan
All this makes a lot more sense if we stop seeing these world leaders as "Globalist Puppets" and instead see them as "Globalist Pawns". Whats the difference? Puppets are brainless shells who can be told what to do and they will do it, regardless of what they think about it. Obama is probably one of the first true Globalist Puppet.
"Pawns" on the other hand are extremely passionate, intelligent and capable in their own field of specialty. They have a singular goal (usually derived from patriotism or some other form of higher ambition), which just so happens to align with the short term objectives of the Cabal in that particular area.
Example: George Washington, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin, Gadaffi, Saddam, bin Laden and on and on.
They only go in one direction and when the Cabal needs to change the direction, they need to be removed from power - sometimes they do it voluntarily, most of the times they have to use force. Around this time is when they realise the pawn-nature of themselves and they "fight back against the Globalist".
Or do you think the Iran-Iraq war when the CIA funded and armed Sadam was just a coincidence?
Again, this was part of a bigger strategy of keeping middle east destabilized, while also keeping two of their puppets in check (again a very common strategy in the British divide and conquer rule).
We were warned back then who was behind it..... Khazarian zionist mafia
"The Executive Intelligence Review is in possession of indisputable evidence that the Muslim Brotherhood clique that controls Iran and runs the Ayatollah Khomeini (Supreme Leader today) and his Islamic Revolutionary Council, is a puppet of British, Israeli, and U.S. secret services. We have traced the origins of the Brotherhood in the British Scottish Rite of Freemasonry and the Bahai, and we have identified its historic connection to the rise of Zionism. .......
British aristocratic controllers of the Muslim Brotherhood-men such as Lord Caradon, Sir John Bagot Glubb Pasha, Sir Albert Beeley, and the Royal Institute
of International Affairs (RIIA) along with the Middle East and Islamic departments of Oxford and Cambridge
universities...........
Together with Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Ramsey Clark, it is that oligarchical faction that created, and now deploys, the Muslim Brotherhood.
That is the "secret" behind the Ayatollah Khomeini."
Amazing to think that two weeks after the coupe.... this article was (allowed? ) published....
Btw, if you want to see what is behind even the Khazarian Mafia/Zionist/Banksters, I would recommend the Mystery Babylon series by William Cooper. Its available on Rumble.
I am well informed on Wm Coopers works. Great work with Excellence in every aspect of historical "corrections"!!! As more become familiar with his works, the more redpilling reinforcement arguments will be made!!!
I keep dropping links to EIR every now and then, and I am always hoping that a discerning Anon might catch on to just how explosive that now little talked about publication is.
Amazing to think that two weeks after the coupe.... this article was (allowed? ) published....
For that, you have to understand who Lyndon LaRouche was. Long before Assange and Q Drops and even Bill Cooper, there was a redpill machine and his name was LaRouche. But unlike most redpillers, he was not just a preacher. He took active part in politics. He travelled around the world and met world leaders and understood what was going on behind the scenes and more than anything else, he pieced together the Globalist/Zionist/Intel agenda behind the world politics. He started off as a far left marxist and ended up as a far right red piller.
He even ran for president as an candidate multiple times and ultimately came pretty close to getting nominated as the Democratic candidate, which is when they used the weaponised DOJ to arrest him, convict him and throw him away in prison, but he still didn't stop.
The EIR was his publication and even now, if you go to https://larouchepub.com/ and search almost any event / people in the past century, you will find yourself spending wee hours in the morning reading the results from EIR !
But thanks for pointing it out. It's a testament to the general knowledgable level of this board.
No need to be condescending. The opposite of knowledge, isn't ignorance, but the illusion of knowledge which you have on full display in your post.
Not sure whom you are referring to here. Afaik he took office after his father was forced to abdicate right in the middle of WW2.
Well maybe instead of complaining about the knowledge level of this board, you should read about Mohammad Mosaddegh and the 1953 coup to oust him and give full power to Shah.
Here are a couple of tidbits from that revolution:
The 1953 Iranian coup d'état was the overthrow of the Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh in favor of strengthening the monarchical rule of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi on 19 August 1953, orchestrated by the United Kingdom (under the name "Operation Boot") and the United States (under the name TPAJAX Project)
Mossadegh had sought to audit the books of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), a British corporation (now BP) and to change the terms of the company's access to Iranian petroleum reserves.
In August 2013, 60 years after the coup, the American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) admitted that it was involved in both its planning and its execution, including the bribing of Iranian politicians, security and army high-ranking officials, as well as pro-coup propaganda
I'll leave the rest the research to you.
However I did read the rest of your post, and not sure where it aligns with what I said.
When it comes to pawns vs puppets, it literally the same thing. From the Cambridge dictionary:
A pawn is also a person who is controlled by others and used for their own advantage
I want to emphasize this word: Controlled. Doesn't sound like free will to me like you've implied in your post. And if they break free, then they are not pawns. They might have cooperated because of mutual goals, however that doesn't make them pawns.
George Washington, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin, Gadaffi, Saddam, bin Laden and on and on
On this list only Hitler and bin Laden were pawns. Again, not sure what this has to do with Iran.
I am not sure why you think I was being condescending. We are both in violent agreement that Shah of Iran was a Globalist pawn and I have respect for Anons who know their history. As a moderator of this board, I also take a certain amount of pride in the fact that users here are in general more knowledgable than most other communities.
The only point we differ on is that you believe Khomeni came to power organically to overthrow the Banksters whereas I provided you with enough information to be able to question that assumption.
Here is something I will leave you with that might make your head spin. Look into what Khomeini said about Mosadegh. Then look into what Ayatollah Kashani's role was in toppling Mosadegh, and finally look into what Khomeni homself was doing when Mosadegh was toppled over. You will finally understand everything is a Banker's war and everyone is a Banker's pawn. Infact, try and see if you can dig into who Khomeini was before he changed his name to Khomeini.
I use the words Puppets vs Pawns because they literally describe what I am explaining. A puppet needs a string pull to make every move, and can be made to do anything. A pawn has rules and cannot go in arbitrary directions, and yet can be carefully manoeuvred into doing what you need it to do.
BTW, I don't take credit for that term - I borrowed the word "Pawn" from William Carr's book title "Pawns in the Game".
Sounds AWESOME. These people need relief from the control of the cabal as do we ALL. However they have had it worse. BUT in spite of this they have maintained a high IQ and relatively informed populace compared to their western counterparts.
With his comments condemning the Olympics opening ceremony, I am beginning to think Iran may finally have a decent leader. He has a tough job ahead of him. Thanks for the key points.
The overarching goal of this approach is to create stable international conditions conducive to peace and development.
...
It seeks to balance Iran’s interests in a multipolar world while remaining open to dialogue with traditional adversaries. This approach demonstrates a commitment to promoting peace and stability, even in the face of significant challenges.
Iran before CIA replaced the Shah of Iran because he didn’t obey them hard enough: https://youtu.be/T4M_EJzjItk?si=KAhrEN9V0ssi6Rtk
You do know that the Shah of Iran was a globalist puppet that was inserted when they killed the guy who wanted to kick out the Rockafellers and nationalize the oil supply?
Isn't it kind of funny how the same people that tell you Russia, Russia, Russia are also telling you Iran, Iran, Iran.
Maybe it wasn't a CIA coup, but someone who kicked the globohomos out. Or do you think the Iran-Iraq war when the CIA funded and armed Sadam was just a coincidence?
Yes fren, hence my very specific choice of words:
But thanks for pointing it out. Its a testament to the general knowledgable level of this board.
Not sure whom you are referring to here. Afaik he took office after his father was forced to abdicate right in the middle of WW2.
And this is where you would be wrong, but its excusable since it is indeed very tempting to think that the person who defeats our enemy has to be our friend. In reality, in most cases, the person defeated and the person defeating him are both pawns of the Satanists and the process itself usually part of a realignment of Cabal strategy in the region.
First, let me present to you a detailed report to show you who was behind Khomeni
The switch from Shah to Khomeni was part of the transition to Petro-dollar by the Cabal as a world control system. This required centralized control of Oil and OPEC was the monopolistic structure they created for this, but Iran was not playing ball. It is explained in Iran shutdown to implement Brandt plan
All this makes a lot more sense if we stop seeing these world leaders as "Globalist Puppets" and instead see them as "Globalist Pawns". Whats the difference? Puppets are brainless shells who can be told what to do and they will do it, regardless of what they think about it. Obama is probably one of the first true Globalist Puppet.
"Pawns" on the other hand are extremely passionate, intelligent and capable in their own field of specialty. They have a singular goal (usually derived from patriotism or some other form of higher ambition), which just so happens to align with the short term objectives of the Cabal in that particular area.
Example: George Washington, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin, Gadaffi, Saddam, bin Laden and on and on.
They only go in one direction and when the Cabal needs to change the direction, they need to be removed from power - sometimes they do it voluntarily, most of the times they have to use force. Around this time is when they realise the pawn-nature of themselves and they "fight back against the Globalist".
Again, this was part of a bigger strategy of keeping middle east destabilized, while also keeping two of their puppets in check (again a very common strategy in the British divide and conquer rule).
We were warned back then who was behind it..... Khazarian zionist mafia
"The Executive Intelligence Review is in possession of indisputable evidence that the Muslim Brotherhood clique that controls Iran and runs the Ayatollah Khomeini (Supreme Leader today) and his Islamic Revolutionary Council, is a puppet of British, Israeli, and U.S. secret services. We have traced the origins of the Brotherhood in the British Scottish Rite of Freemasonry and the Bahai, and we have identified its historic connection to the rise of Zionism. ....... British aristocratic controllers of the Muslim Brotherhood-men such as Lord Caradon, Sir John Bagot Glubb Pasha, Sir Albert Beeley, and the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) along with the Middle East and Islamic departments of Oxford and Cambridge universities........... Together with Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Ramsey Clark, it is that oligarchical faction that created, and now deploys, the Muslim Brotherhood. That is the "secret" behind the Ayatollah Khomeini."
Amazing to think that two weeks after the coupe.... this article was (allowed? ) published....
This is why we are here, right? Stay safe fren! NCSWIC WWG1WGA
Btw, if you want to see what is behind even the Khazarian Mafia/Zionist/Banksters, I would recommend the Mystery Babylon series by William Cooper. Its available on Rumble.
I am well informed on Wm Coopers works. Great work with Excellence in every aspect of historical "corrections"!!! As more become familiar with his works, the more redpilling reinforcement arguments will be made!!!
I keep dropping links to EIR every now and then, and I am always hoping that a discerning Anon might catch on to just how explosive that now little talked about publication is.
For that, you have to understand who Lyndon LaRouche was. Long before Assange and Q Drops and even Bill Cooper, there was a redpill machine and his name was LaRouche. But unlike most redpillers, he was not just a preacher. He took active part in politics. He travelled around the world and met world leaders and understood what was going on behind the scenes and more than anything else, he pieced together the Globalist/Zionist/Intel agenda behind the world politics. He started off as a far left marxist and ended up as a far right red piller.
He even ran for president as an candidate multiple times and ultimately came pretty close to getting nominated as the Democratic candidate, which is when they used the weaponised DOJ to arrest him, convict him and throw him away in prison, but he still didn't stop.
The EIR was his publication and even now, if you go to https://larouchepub.com/ and search almost any event / people in the past century, you will find yourself spending wee hours in the morning reading the results from EIR !
I'm going to that site after I respond to your comment! Thanks! Stay safe fren! NCSWIC WWG1WGA
No need to be condescending. The opposite of knowledge, isn't ignorance, but the illusion of knowledge which you have on full display in your post.
Well maybe instead of complaining about the knowledge level of this board, you should read about Mohammad Mosaddegh and the 1953 coup to oust him and give full power to Shah.
Here are a couple of tidbits from that revolution:
I'll leave the rest the research to you.
However I did read the rest of your post, and not sure where it aligns with what I said.
When it comes to pawns vs puppets, it literally the same thing. From the Cambridge dictionary:
I want to emphasize this word: Controlled. Doesn't sound like free will to me like you've implied in your post. And if they break free, then they are not pawns. They might have cooperated because of mutual goals, however that doesn't make them pawns.
On this list only Hitler and bin Laden were pawns. Again, not sure what this has to do with Iran.
I am not sure why you think I was being condescending. We are both in violent agreement that Shah of Iran was a Globalist pawn and I have respect for Anons who know their history. As a moderator of this board, I also take a certain amount of pride in the fact that users here are in general more knowledgable than most other communities.
The only point we differ on is that you believe Khomeni came to power organically to overthrow the Banksters whereas I provided you with enough information to be able to question that assumption.
Here is something I will leave you with that might make your head spin. Look into what Khomeini said about Mosadegh. Then look into what Ayatollah Kashani's role was in toppling Mosadegh, and finally look into what Khomeni homself was doing when Mosadegh was toppled over. You will finally understand everything is a Banker's war and everyone is a Banker's pawn. Infact, try and see if you can dig into who Khomeini was before he changed his name to Khomeini.
I use the words Puppets vs Pawns because they literally describe what I am explaining. A puppet needs a string pull to make every move, and can be made to do anything. A pawn has rules and cannot go in arbitrary directions, and yet can be carefully manoeuvred into doing what you need it to do.
BTW, I don't take credit for that term - I borrowed the word "Pawn" from William Carr's book title "Pawns in the Game".
Thanks for that. A very unsettled past. It didn’t help that they made very bad deals.
Perhaps you Pedo-Trolls should do a little more research before you come here and try and spew your senseless drivel.
Does the number 1947 ring your empty bell?
Oh, and you know the drill. Enjoy your short time here on GAW troller...
Another product of public school math, HUNDREDS of years??
Sounds AWESOME. These people need relief from the control of the cabal as do we ALL. However they have had it worse. BUT in spite of this they have maintained a high IQ and relatively informed populace compared to their western counterparts.
With his comments condemning the Olympics opening ceremony, I am beginning to think Iran may finally have a decent leader. He has a tough job ahead of him. Thanks for the key points.
When's the last time Iran had a leader that would be okay with the Olympics opening ceremony?
President of Iran has no real power. Their role is mostly ceremonial under the Supreme Leader Khamenei
3...2...1...
From the article...
...
My thought...