What do you think?
It's starting to become clear to me that Satoshi Nakamoto= white hats who created Bitcoin to alter satanic cult's plan to create CBDC and to send mockery to the fiat monetary system.
Satoshi holds 1,100,000 BTC. Trump said gov't will use bitcoin as asset backing for currency.
What if, we already have 1,100,000 Bitcoin? Remember, there only 21,000,000 BTC. That is a massive holding. White hats already have it?
Fun to think about. Thoughts?
Wouldn't surprise me if the Bitcoin Trump talked about using as the reserve was in Satoshi's wallet. Since I began watching Rugpull Radio I've been more inclined to believe Bitcoin is a Whitehat op.
On the other hand the Crypto Conspiracy podcast was arguing a couple years back that Bitcoin is connected to Epstein and co. They also did have a couple guests who argued that it was a goodguy thing that got co-opted by the banksters a long time ago and that Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV branches closer match the whitepaper that laid out the proposed evolution for Bitcoin.
These conspiracies exist for a reason, because stupid people tries to make conclusions without knowing the full picture.
Take encryption for example, some of the best algorithms are created by the NSA. But the specifications are open, the code is open source, and it's mathematically proven by multiple independent third parties that there is no back doors or other fuckery, you can verify this yourself too with basic math and programming skills.
So what's the deal you might ask? Why are they giving us access to good encryption. The answer is simple, because if CIA was the only ones using say AES-256 encryption everyone would see those packages and instantly know that it's CIA traffic, when everyone uses is you can't tell the difference between a CIA agent and the average Joe.
Same exact thing with the TOR network. If only CIA was using it every webmaster would know that TOR = CIA agent. Now anyone can use TOR and you have no idea who's behind the proxy IP, could be a CIA agent or more likely an average Joe. Benefits overrides the negatives.
Same thnig with crypto, open source and mathematically verifiable. It doesn't matter who created it and why as anyone with basic math and programming skills can verify that there's nothing shady going on within the network itself. There's of course shady exchanges and plenty of scammers trying to steal your coins which is why proper knowledge is important.
You're right on that some people come to erroneous conclusions because they are missing key details, I see this all the time with friends and family who reject Q or never heard of it and Devolution.
However I still pay some attention to it 1) to avoid falling into an echo chamber and 2) if someone outside is coming to similar conclusions (like how Devolution Theory already lined up heavily with Q before the author had even read Q drops) it provides some extra evidence that we're on the correct path.
Yes, too many people misunderstand "security through obscurity" and think it only applies to trying to hide your insecure server from bad guys and hope they never stumble upon it. It can also refer to hiding something in plain sight that is also secured but because it's not obvious it's less likely to be directly attacked to begin with and if it is attacked it tries to repel it without being too obvious.
Bitcoin Cash was a blatant attempt by Jihan Wu and Micree Zhan (co founders of Bitmain) to split the fledgling bitcoin community and sell more mining equipment. They spent millions pushing Bitcoin Cash trying to make it a real competitor. With their mining equipment and low difficulty rate on the BCH chain, they held nearly all the BCH in the early days, and desperately needed to create a market place for it. No. BCH is most certainly NOT a white hat op, unless you believe the white hats needed the Chinese to make it work.
BSV is even worse. Craig Wright is the world's worst scam artist, laughably trying to convince people that he was Satoshi, when he can't even be remote placed with Nick Szabo. While nobody is 100% sure what person or group represents Satoshi Nakamoto, Bayesian Analysis of the writings in the early days shows that Nick is almost certainly one of the people who wrote the early emails under the pseudonym.
And what was the big controversy back then?
Whether or not to make larger blocks so more transactions could be included at a cheaper price (BCH), or whether they wanted to keep the existing block size and separate out some non essential components to allow more space inside the traditional 4MB size (BTC). There were technical reasons for both approaches. If keeping the 4MB block size and going to SEGWIT was a black hat operation, it was a damn good one, because there was very little psychology involved in the discussions during those days. They were purely technical discussions about the plusses and minuses of both sides. But the real reason I think BTC won out is precisely because Bitmain was so hated. As soon as they publicly sided with BCH, the deal was sealed.
Bitcoin cash and bitcoin sv are frauds.
Be VERY weary of Craig Wright.
I promise you he is a fraud.
Yes, the real Bitcoin has slightly deviated from satoshi’s original whitepaper, but the deviations were not just co-opted and changed by big bankers…. The miners themselves are the only ones who can vote on and make a change to the protocol.
These are done through BIP “Bitcoin improvement proposal”
If an improvement is good, and the miners agree it is good, they can effectively trigger this change on the network to take place by directing their mining power to do that.
In the early days of bitcoin, the mining hashpower was so evenly distributed to individuals, there was not these huge mining pools back then… so it was impossible to have enough hashpower to force a vote to pass when the majority of people voted against it, and vice versa.
What BCH did was simply a money grab, they forked the blockchain and created their own coin just to get a 1:1 copy of their BTC, but on BCH.
What BSV did was basically just Craig Dumbfuck Wright’s narcissist plight to assume the role as Satoshi Nakamoto. Until he proves he owns the genesis wallet, he is a fraud.
Yeah one of the guys (maybe it was Craig Wright) said a lot of things that didn't sit right with me. Another said some stuff that gave me some Charlie Ward vibes as well.