What do you think?
It's starting to become clear to me that Satoshi Nakamoto= white hats who created Bitcoin to alter satanic cult's plan to create CBDC and to send mockery to the fiat monetary system.
Satoshi holds 1,100,000 BTC. Trump said gov't will use bitcoin as asset backing for currency.
What if, we already have 1,100,000 Bitcoin? Remember, there only 21,000,000 BTC. That is a massive holding. White hats already have it?
Fun to think about. Thoughts?
Wouldn't surprise me if the Bitcoin Trump talked about using as the reserve was in Satoshi's wallet. Since I began watching Rugpull Radio I've been more inclined to believe Bitcoin is a Whitehat op.
On the other hand the Crypto Conspiracy podcast was arguing a couple years back that Bitcoin is connected to Epstein and co. They also did have a couple guests who argued that it was a goodguy thing that got co-opted by the banksters a long time ago and that Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV branches closer match the whitepaper that laid out the proposed evolution for Bitcoin.
Bitcoin Cash was a blatant attempt by Jihan Wu and Micree Zhan (co founders of Bitmain) to split the fledgling bitcoin community and sell more mining equipment. They spent millions pushing Bitcoin Cash trying to make it a real competitor. With their mining equipment and low difficulty rate on the BCH chain, they held nearly all the BCH in the early days, and desperately needed to create a market place for it. No. BCH is most certainly NOT a white hat op, unless you believe the white hats needed the Chinese to make it work.
BSV is even worse. Craig Wright is the world's worst scam artist, laughably trying to convince people that he was Satoshi, when he can't even be remote placed with Nick Szabo. While nobody is 100% sure what person or group represents Satoshi Nakamoto, Bayesian Analysis of the writings in the early days shows that Nick is almost certainly one of the people who wrote the early emails under the pseudonym.
And what was the big controversy back then?
Whether or not to make larger blocks so more transactions could be included at a cheaper price (BCH), or whether they wanted to keep the existing block size and separate out some non essential components to allow more space inside the traditional 4MB size (BTC). There were technical reasons for both approaches. If keeping the 4MB block size and going to SEGWIT was a black hat operation, it was a damn good one, because there was very little psychology involved in the discussions during those days. They were purely technical discussions about the plusses and minuses of both sides. But the real reason I think BTC won out is precisely because Bitmain was so hated. As soon as they publicly sided with BCH, the deal was sealed.