I know a LOT of people that feel identical---they are engineers and scientists. We are responsible for making things that work.
Which assertions? That there is no evidence of dimensions higher than what we experience? Since there is no evidence, what would they be doing by thinking so? All you have is airy-fairy dreams about fantasy possibilities. You don't have any evidence. At least I understand the origin of the Casimir force. Do you even know what it is? And how it relates to the quantum vacuum? I've mentioned other challenges to conventional thinking, but you are not interested in them, so you are in a poor position to think you have a better understanding.
I plan to research more on the Casimir force. I really don't know enough to comment on it. You can't offend me pal... but seriously, you seem to have some desire to do so. Nice try.
I don't share much of my personal experiences nor do I claim to know it all because of the people in my orbit. Obviously, your path, your present bubble does not includes the same experiences. Are you going to now start demanding I use the right pronouns too in alignment with your thinking?
Lighten up pal. This isn't an attack on you personally.
I will say this, if you knew what your anger did to your physical body chemistry, your biology, your DNA and the electromagnetic field you generate... you would never employ such an angry demeanor... all mainstream science. So obviously you are naive in such matters... thus proof that you still have some learning to do.
I'm just letting you know that I am aware of physical phenomena of which you are not, so kindly stop talking down to me. I only "demand" that you know what you are talking about.
Odd, that you want to cast this conversation as antagonism and attack. I have known since being a small child that one is impervious to words.
You misunderstand my manner. I don't go along with the Internet "egalitarianism", where everybody thinks they are equally equipped to comment on a subject. I have a lot of background I haven't mentioned---just too much to mention. But I see you have wandered from the subject to psychoanalysis, which tells me your ability to discuss the subject has petered out.
Well no, I haven't petered out. I enjoy most exchanges I have online. I wasn't feeling the joy in this conversation. Equally relevant, you lost my attention when you appeared quite adamant about the existence of realities in higher dimensional.
We likely share some skepticism regarding esoteric materials... thus I very spiritual but not religions. Standing in contrast however, there are very limited resources for researching anything outside of 3D and even outside Earth civilizations and thus this forces research into esoteric sources to consider. It is from these collective of colliding sources I have formed opinions. Some of these would be controversial to classical teaching and disciplines like yours.
Even so, I am not blaming you nor attacking your position. A polite exchange is welcomed but I am not here to argue nor to convert you. Fair?
No problem with that. But keep in mind that another person's life entails exposure to things you are not familiar with. It is presumptuous to accuse a person of having a closed mind when they have read and digested material you have not. As for things beyond 3 dimensions, I will pay attention when there is evidence that we can't avoid. One of the things about a scientific education and a technical career is the development of a profound respect for what is true---because nothing will work if it is not true. I have read serious unconventional speculation by mature scientists, written at their level, and am a long ways beyond sophomoric bull sessions. I may have a higher standard for evaluating speculation.
I know a LOT of people that feel identical---they are engineers and scientists. We are responsible for making things that work.
Which assertions? That there is no evidence of dimensions higher than what we experience? Since there is no evidence, what would they be doing by thinking so? All you have is airy-fairy dreams about fantasy possibilities. You don't have any evidence. At least I understand the origin of the Casimir force. Do you even know what it is? And how it relates to the quantum vacuum? I've mentioned other challenges to conventional thinking, but you are not interested in them, so you are in a poor position to think you have a better understanding.
I plan to research more on the Casimir force. I really don't know enough to comment on it. You can't offend me pal... but seriously, you seem to have some desire to do so. Nice try.
I don't share much of my personal experiences nor do I claim to know it all because of the people in my orbit. Obviously, your path, your present bubble does not includes the same experiences. Are you going to now start demanding I use the right pronouns too in alignment with your thinking?
Lighten up pal. This isn't an attack on you personally.
I will say this, if you knew what your anger did to your physical body chemistry, your biology, your DNA and the electromagnetic field you generate... you would never employ such an angry demeanor... all mainstream science. So obviously you are naive in such matters... thus proof that you still have some learning to do.
Good luck in your journey and chill out man.
I'm just letting you know that I am aware of physical phenomena of which you are not, so kindly stop talking down to me. I only "demand" that you know what you are talking about.
Odd, that you want to cast this conversation as antagonism and attack. I have known since being a small child that one is impervious to words.
You misunderstand my manner. I don't go along with the Internet "egalitarianism", where everybody thinks they are equally equipped to comment on a subject. I have a lot of background I haven't mentioned---just too much to mention. But I see you have wandered from the subject to psychoanalysis, which tells me your ability to discuss the subject has petered out.
Well no, I haven't petered out. I enjoy most exchanges I have online. I wasn't feeling the joy in this conversation. Equally relevant, you lost my attention when you appeared quite adamant about the existence of realities in higher dimensional.
We likely share some skepticism regarding esoteric materials... thus I very spiritual but not religions. Standing in contrast however, there are very limited resources for researching anything outside of 3D and even outside Earth civilizations and thus this forces research into esoteric sources to consider. It is from these collective of colliding sources I have formed opinions. Some of these would be controversial to classical teaching and disciplines like yours.
Even so, I am not blaming you nor attacking your position. A polite exchange is welcomed but I am not here to argue nor to convert you. Fair?
No problem with that. But keep in mind that another person's life entails exposure to things you are not familiar with. It is presumptuous to accuse a person of having a closed mind when they have read and digested material you have not. As for things beyond 3 dimensions, I will pay attention when there is evidence that we can't avoid. One of the things about a scientific education and a technical career is the development of a profound respect for what is true---because nothing will work if it is not true. I have read serious unconventional speculation by mature scientists, written at their level, and am a long ways beyond sophomoric bull sessions. I may have a higher standard for evaluating speculation.