Yes they had a go at him, to publicly get something on his 'record'. After all he is a high-profile person disagree-ing with war.
It was a fictitious case, no underage girl was touched. In fact it was based on a chat with a 28-yr old underover cop lady, pretending to be a 17 yr old. So the other party could be done for entrapment. And he didn't do anything, but say he needed a shower now. Which could actually mean anything.
So, you tell me. He has a wife and daughter who he is very proud of. Maybe he thought it was interesting to see what they were up to, so obviously.
Bullshit. Read the fucking article. It was a "15 year old girl", not 17, and he was flogging his flounder during the explicitly sexual chat. He was convicted by a jury on 5 felony counts and acquitted on one. That is not entrapment.
But she was 28, masquerading. So, she wasn't really 15, just pretending to be, to very much entrap him. So it's only the very IDEA of him defiling a 15-year old, and of course pedo-stuff is outrageous, so everyone kneejerks with it.
Anyway, are we, as a society, really going to go after people beating their meat at home on a live stream? Why are they not shutting down underage thots? Oh I forgot, they only censor people who don't agree with government policy. It seems OTT to me, to go after wanking, even if it is to 'underage girls' (that are really adult women playacting, and that happens). Fundamentally, the alleged filthy masturbators ARE IN A DIFFERENT locatiion from the supposed 'victim' (who is undressing and moving suggestively). NVM it is illegal to look at girls.
So it's OK to have girls showing it all, but not OK for boys to look and having a private little wank? ONLINE, mind you. Are we really going to make sure that sort of stuff doesn't happen? Next, they will go after anime. I mean Japanese people love seeing some schoolgirl knickers.
LOL. Good luck. Get off the grass.
Anyway, does anyone have any proof of Scott actually touching himself? Never saw it, or even any links to it (which I prolly would not click anyway). Not that I am amping to see it, but nobody ever talks or references video evidence, so I deduce there is NO proof. In fact, most of those chats are encrypted, so how would any 'girl' suddenly have video of a dude wanking, unless they WANTED to blackmail him? I saw the court transcript, because I needed to know what was said. All they had was that he wrote "I need to take a shower now" - on the chat. So the whole case rested on inference and rumor.
No, the whole thing sounds fishy. And it invites people to jump to conclusions.
I do know that the spooks love a bit of sexual blackmail, and this whole thing is just part of them trying to 'get' him, to shut him up, ever since Scott didn't 'find' Weapons of Mass Destruction' in Iraq. Now the US government are trying to get him on the Foreign Agents laws: He is married to a Georgian woman, and he travelled to Russia, and his books are tranlated into Russian. So it must be true. /s.
The FBI is conducting a search at the Delmar home of Scott Ritter.
The investigation details remain unclear.
Scott's passport was recently confiscated and he was prevented from flying to Russia where he was scheduled to speak at a conference in St. Petersburg.
He also met with RFK Jr. last night.
William Scott Ritter Jr. is an American author, former United States Marine Corps intelligence officer, former United Nations Special Commission weapons inspector and convicted child sex offender. Ritter served as a junior military analyst during Operation Desert Storm.
As of this post, the Scott Ritter Show, Ep. 82, is still scheduled to stream on Rumble tonight (8/7) at 9 PM ET. Scott was scheduled to be live on Redacted this afternoon but canceled.
That trip to Russia Judge Napolitano was supposed to go with him..
I did a search, and the info said he was both a former UN weapons inspector AND convicted child sex offender (pedophile) back in 2011.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/former-un-weapons-inspector-guilty-in-sex-case-1.992775
That is a strange combination... even stranger with Judge Nap and JFK Jr. going along for the ride.
Yes they had a go at him, to publicly get something on his 'record'. After all he is a high-profile person disagree-ing with war.
It was a fictitious case, no underage girl was touched. In fact it was based on a chat with a 28-yr old underover cop lady, pretending to be a 17 yr old. So the other party could be done for entrapment. And he didn't do anything, but say he needed a shower now. Which could actually mean anything.
So, you tell me. He has a wife and daughter who he is very proud of. Maybe he thought it was interesting to see what they were up to, so obviously.
Bullshit. Read the fucking article. It was a "15 year old girl", not 17, and he was flogging his flounder during the explicitly sexual chat. He was convicted by a jury on 5 felony counts and acquitted on one. That is not entrapment.
But she was 28, masquerading. So, she wasn't really 15, just pretending to be, to very much entrap him. So it's only the very IDEA of him defiling a 15-year old, and of course pedo-stuff is outrageous, so everyone kneejerks with it.
Anyway, are we, as a society, really going to go after people beating their meat at home on a live stream? Why are they not shutting down underage thots? Oh I forgot, they only censor people who don't agree with government policy. It seems OTT to me, to go after wanking, even if it is to 'underage girls' (that are really adult women playacting, and that happens). Fundamentally, the alleged filthy masturbators ARE IN A DIFFERENT locatiion from the supposed 'victim' (who is undressing and moving suggestively). NVM it is illegal to look at girls.
So it's OK to have girls showing it all, but not OK for boys to look and having a private little wank? ONLINE, mind you. Are we really going to make sure that sort of stuff doesn't happen? Next, they will go after anime. I mean Japanese people love seeing some schoolgirl knickers.
LOL. Good luck. Get off the grass.
Anyway, does anyone have any proof of Scott actually touching himself? Never saw it, or even any links to it (which I prolly would not click anyway). Not that I am amping to see it, but nobody ever talks or references video evidence, so I deduce there is NO proof. In fact, most of those chats are encrypted, so how would any 'girl' suddenly have video of a dude wanking, unless they WANTED to blackmail him? I saw the court transcript, because I needed to know what was said. All they had was that he wrote "I need to take a shower now" - on the chat. So the whole case rested on inference and rumor.
No, the whole thing sounds fishy. And it invites people to jump to conclusions.
I do know that the spooks love a bit of sexual blackmail, and this whole thing is just part of them trying to 'get' him, to shut him up, ever since Scott didn't 'find' Weapons of Mass Destruction' in Iraq. Now the US government are trying to get him on the Foreign Agents laws: He is married to a Georgian woman, and he travelled to Russia, and his books are tranlated into Russian. So it must be true. /s.
Keep digging on UN sex offenders in their ranks until notions about it being a "strange combo" fall by the way side...
The FBI is conducting a search at the Delmar home of Scott Ritter.
The investigation details remain unclear.
Scott's passport was recently confiscated and he was prevented from flying to Russia where he was scheduled to speak at a conference in St. Petersburg.
RE:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Ritter
It should read “The United States SECRET POLICE is conducting a search at the Delmar home of Scott Ritter.
I love Scott! I watch all his youtubes and he is the most informative person on all the wars going on.
I don't believe that bullshit about the sex crime, I think he was framed. I hope he is careful because I think they are out to get him.
https://x.com/MyLordBebo/status/1821264369084232050
As of this post, the Scott Ritter Show, Ep. 82, is still scheduled to stream on Rumble tonight (8/7) at 9 PM ET. Scott was scheduled to be live on Redacted this afternoon but canceled.
The Diddler strikes again.
Take his balls, if he has any.