Why the 2nd??? For Enemies Foreign And DOMESTIC !!!!๐๐๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ
(media.greatawakening.win)
WWG1WGA
Comments (13)
sorted by:
You donโt need a gun. You require a gun.
And for foreign invaders.
๐๐๐
Shall. NOT. Be. Infringed.
I approve this message.
For when the Uk comes for you because you posted spicy means about muzzies.
A 22 for far away tyranny? Surely we can do better. At least 308.
Because The 1st.
I honestly, for a few seconds there, read it as TRANNYโฆ TRANNYโฆ๐ and Iโm thinking what the? Then it felt into place. Must be the slight dyslexia in me. Now, the necessity for 2A makes sense ๐๐๐
It is important that we, as Americans, understand that our Right to Bear Arms comes from our Creator, God, himself. No government has any authority to infringe on that right.
More importantly, the 2nd amendment was put into place to remind government of that prohibition on infringing on that preexisting right.
How does this play into the Courts? Because they are required to always use the Constitution, in the context of its original intent at the time it was written, as the measuring stick for any legislation or act of government.
โThe public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judgesโ views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice. I have no fear of constitutional amendments properly adopted, but I do fear the rewriting of the Constitution by judges under the guise of interpretation.โ ~ Justice Hugo L. Black (1886-1971) US Supreme Court Justice
โTo prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm ... is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutionally protected right.โ ~ Wilson v. State 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)
โ 'The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the milita, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right.โ ~ Nunn vs. State 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251(1846)
โThe provision in the Constitution granting the right to all persons to bear arms is a limitation upon the power of the Legislature to enact any law to the contrary. The exercise of a right guaranteed by the Constitution cannot be made subject to the will of the sheriff.โ ~ People vs. Zerillo 219 Mich. 635, 189 N.W. 927, at 928 (1922)
โIf the legislature clearly misinterprets a constitutional provision, the frequent repetition of the wrong will not create a right.โ ~ Amos v. Mosley Amos v. Mosley, 74 Fla. 555; 77 So. 619.
โAmericans need never fear their government because of the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation.โ ~ James Madison (1751-1836), Father of the Constitution for the USA, 4th US President
โResistance to sudden violence, for the preservation not only of my person, my limbs and life, but of my property, is an indisputable right of nature which I have never surrendered to the public by the compact of society, and which perhaps, I could not surrender if I would. Nor is there anything in the common law of England inconsistent with that right.โ ~ John Adams (1735-1826) Founding Father, 2nd US President Boston Gazette, September 5, 1763, reprinted in The Works of John Adams 438 (Charles F. Adams ed., 1851).
โAnd that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press, or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms; or to raise standing armies, unless necessary for the defense of the United States, or of some one or more of them; or to prevent the people from petitioning, in a peaceable and orderly manner, the federal legislature, for a redress of grievances; or to subject the people to unreasonable searches and seizures of their persons, papers or possessions.โ ~ Samuel Adams (1722-1803), was known as the "Father of the American Revolution." Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 1788 (Pierce & Hale, eds., Boston, 1850)
โThe militia of these free commonwealths, entitled and accustomed to their arms, when compared with any possible army, must be tremendous and irresistible. Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American ... the unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.โ ~ Tench Coxe (1755-1824) American political economist Pennsylvania Gazette, February 20, 1788
โThe militia of these free commonwealths, entitled and accustomed to their arms, when compared with any possible army, must be tremendous and irresistible. Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American ... the unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.โ ~ Tench Coxe (1755-1824) American political economist Pennsylvania Gazette, February 20, 1788
โBut if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rightsโ ~ Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Federalist, No. 29
โAre we at last brought to such a humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defence? Where is the difference between having our arms in our own possession and under our own direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defence be the_real_object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?โ ~ Patrick Henry (1736-1799) US Founding Father June 9, 1788, in the Virginia Convention on the ratification of the Constitution, in_Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution,_ Jonathan Elliot, ed., v.3 p.168 (Philadelphia, 1836)
โNo free man shall ever be de-barred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain their right to keep and bear arms is as a last resort to protect themselves against tyranny in government.โ ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
โThe people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them.โ ~ Zachariah Johnson June 25, 1788, Virginia Constitutional Ratification Convention. Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, Jonathan Elliot, ed., v.3 p.646 (Philadelphia, 1836)
โTo preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.โ ~ Richard Henry Lee (1732-1794) Founding Father
โThe highest number to which a standing army can be carried in any country does not exceed one hundredth part of the souls, or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This portion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men. To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. It may well be doubted whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. ... Besides the advantage of being armed, ... the existence of subordinate governments ... forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. ... [The governments of Europe] are afraid to trust the people with arms. ... Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession than the debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors.โ ~ James Madison (1751-1836), Father of the Constitution for the USA, 4th US President The Federalist Papers, No. 46
Australias biggest fark up. Giving them up
it's good to have all the bases covered!
Amen!