It's an X account that appears to promote clickbait and disinfo content mixed in with Maga type stuff. (see my comment above)
The X account attributes the story to a so-called "JulianAssangeWiki" account on Telegram. FYI, there are kazillions of fake accounts on Telegram masquerading as legit sources, etc, and I think you can bet your bottom dollar this particular account has nothing to do with Assange except for attempting to exploit the name for clicks.
Thank you for taking the time to find that X link. This thread that Purkiss posted makes way more sense with that link. How far down that post are the words of Jack Straw before he starts quoting the Russian soldier's words? I'm assuming the text with quotation marks are all the accounts of what the Russian soldier experienced.
Firstly, none of this is JS's words, if I read this correctly. He is copy/pasting from a telegram channel post, one that is (obviously pretending to be) a "julianAssangeWiki" channel.
The quoted text is presented as a Russian Soldier's words. However, there is zero source or references, so it is 100% just as likely to be something someone wrote - aka pure fiction - as it is to be an actual quote.
Scratch that. The absence of any source, reference of corroborating evidence makes it far more likely that its fictitious, imo.
Given also that the JS account is posting clickbait and disinfo operations, given that the story is virtually identical to a (fake) report posted by fake disinfo operation Real Raw News AND The People's Voice, I'd say there is about 90% likely hood that its a pure concoction.
The fact that it meshes with certain grounded suspicions that we might have re: Ukraine and the global satanic elite should NOT be considered corroborating evidence. Why? Because anyone can make up anything that suits or fits our biases or beliefs, and then pass it off as factual when its purely fabricated.
Which is why its so important to apply discernment, critical thinking, empirical data and care to such stories. IMO.
It was deleted because there was no real 'Source'....
okay, but you must have heard or read that statement from somewhere; correct?
Here's the original link that Purkiss posted.
https://x.com/JackStr42679640/status/1825301096807669766
It's an X account that appears to promote clickbait and disinfo content mixed in with Maga type stuff. (see my comment above)
The X account attributes the story to a so-called "JulianAssangeWiki" account on Telegram. FYI, there are kazillions of fake accounts on Telegram masquerading as legit sources, etc, and I think you can bet your bottom dollar this particular account has nothing to do with Assange except for attempting to exploit the name for clicks.
Thank you for taking the time to find that X link. This thread that Purkiss posted makes way more sense with that link. How far down that post are the words of Jack Straw before he starts quoting the Russian soldier's words? I'm assuming the text with quotation marks are all the accounts of what the Russian soldier experienced.
Firstly, none of this is JS's words, if I read this correctly. He is copy/pasting from a telegram channel post, one that is (obviously pretending to be) a "julianAssangeWiki" channel.
The quoted text is presented as a Russian Soldier's words. However, there is zero source or references, so it is 100% just as likely to be something someone wrote - aka pure fiction - as it is to be an actual quote.
Scratch that. The absence of any source, reference of corroborating evidence makes it far more likely that its fictitious, imo.
Given also that the JS account is posting clickbait and disinfo operations, given that the story is virtually identical to a (fake) report posted by fake disinfo operation Real Raw News AND The People's Voice, I'd say there is about 90% likely hood that its a pure concoction.
The fact that it meshes with certain grounded suspicions that we might have re: Ukraine and the global satanic elite should NOT be considered corroborating evidence. Why? Because anyone can make up anything that suits or fits our biases or beliefs, and then pass it off as factual when its purely fabricated.
Which is why its so important to apply discernment, critical thinking, empirical data and care to such stories. IMO.