Modern day prophet.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
Genetic logical fallacies are yet another form of intellectual dishonesty.
I have a finely trained theological LLM that I have been working with for quite some time.
Mine is reformed, post-millennial, 5-point Cal, and spits out remarkably accurate results based on the data sets I've inputed.
I don't take people seriously that think LLMs can't do serious work.
Good day.
The problem has nothing to do with the AI. I'm just suggesting that you cite it.
When someone makes an unconditional statement that later turns out to be conditional... and the condition isn't met... that means the statement was false. that means the number of false statements allowed to be spoken by a prophet is more than zero, according to the Bible.
I am not the one committing logical fallacies or intellectual dishonesty here.
Your AI did fine work. and proved you wrong. Jonah's statement was only revealed to be conditional after hidden conditions were not met. Therefore you cannot judge a prophet based on the strict condition that 100% of their statements come to pass. This was my original position.
what a heinous abuse of claiming logical fallacy. i literally just said you should cite it, instead of claiming the work as your own. this is supposed to be a research site. please do better. your whole position here was dishonest. pure 'holier than thou' bullshit.
Genetic logical fallacy. It doesn't matter where the information comes from. It matters whether it's accurate or inaccurate.
I built my own model from an AIP framework. I sourced the data that is input for different modes. That was my theological output model
My position is that God's word is infallible. Your position was that it isn't .
I didn't say it mattered where your information came from though.
and while you are taking one verse of scripture and interpreting it the way you like, I am taking that verse and interpreting it through scripture as a whole. You are the one ignoring parts of the Bible, not me. Check yourself.
No I'm taking several verses that I cited that say 100% with no ifs, ands, or buts.
You said not 100% (which puts you at odds with 2+ verses of God's Word)
Then when pressed you scraped up ONE example which I was happy to unpack how it was not a failed prophecy AND how about doing so You're not making God's word contain multiple errors and instead be your lack of understanding.
You don't get to tell me (falsely) that I'm ignoring multiple parts of the Bible when you believe that the Bible has errors in it. You lost the ability to stand on scripture.
I have the high ground Anakin.