They plan to take cyanide tablets if arrested.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
Just curious... is it reasonable to think that AI could be used as an impartial judge at some point? I don't trust humans to sustain their integrity. But AI could be hijacked, too. I wonder about it....
Article 14(1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights states:
AI output is a product of its input, as processed by a very complicated set of steps whose effectiveness is not simple to measure. Putting a machine on the bench would raise huge and continuous questions of competence. Who among us would accept a guilty verdict from an AI?
The most I could see would be the attorneys on both sides using AI to form better arguments and surface helpful information, basically automated research assistance that would still need to be cross-checked.
I think you're right. At the very least there would have to be a human checks and balances process. But attorney's using AI to navigate case history would be something I would want from my attorney.