Is this an accurate depiction of the Biblical blood lines?
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
The "enmity" is hostility between the generations or "seeds" of Eve and The Serpent (Not Necessarily Lucifer). Jesus is only referred in the new testament as the Seed , Jesus is not mentioned in the old testament. The Messiah in the OT is vague and unnamed. Though many people interpret it that way, they are not letting the Bible interpret the Bible.
No where in the Bible does it say that there are two separate morning stars. This is your interpretation, not the bible's. Lucifer literally means Light-bringer. He is called Morning Star, Son of the Dawn (Isaiah 14:12) Jesus claims to be "the Light of the World" (John 8:12). Lucifer brought the "Light".
We also have the prophetic message as something completely reliable, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts. (2 Peter 1:19)
I believe Q references this in post #4966
What is coded in your DNA?
Who put it there?
Why?
It seems you and I are so far apart on this particular topic it's not worth ny time arguing with you. Letting the Bible interpret the Bible means using the whole Bible, not segregating the old and new testaments into two different books. Also "The angle of the LORD" spoken about in the old testament is Jesus IMO. Also not mentioned by name specifically in Isaiah 53, however the description makes nearly impossible to deny.
Isaiah 53:3-5
3He was despised and rejected by mankind, a man of suffering, and familiar with pain. Like one from whom people hide their faces he was despised, and we held him in low esteem. 4 Surely he took up our pain and bore our suffering, yet we considered him punished by God, stricken by him, and afflicted. 5 But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
Funny, to me it sounds exactly like what your doing to Lucifer.
Funny I don't remember seeing anywhere where Lucifer was "Pierced" for our transgressions. And I'll throw a bonus verse in there regarding Jesus as the seed.
Galatains 3:16 "Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ."
If you want to believe in some "Christian" Duality that's your own business but I will say you have bought into the same beliefs as those seeking to destroy us and bring us into the "New" age of Enlightenment... or perhaps you already know this and are choosing to come here to be an agitator.
Yes because the NT was written a millennium and a half after the OT. There is no way the NT authors tailored their book to match the OT. That would be gullible to believe.
Galatains is NT, my argument was Jesus was not called the seed in the OT. Not the bonus you think it is.
So you believe the Church is infallible and they would never use religion to control people, or edit the bible fo propaganda purposes in order to do so. What do you think they used to control people before m.s.m.?