Is this an accurate depiction of the Biblical blood lines?
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Funny I don't remember seeing anywhere where Lucifer was "Pierced" for our transgressions. And I'll throw a bonus verse in there regarding Jesus as the seed.
Galatains 3:16 "Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ."
If you want to believe in some "Christian" Duality that's your own business but I will say you have bought into the same beliefs as those seeking to destroy us and bring us into the "New" age of Enlightenment... or perhaps you already know this and are choosing to come here to be an agitator.
Yes because the NT was written a millennium and a half after the OT. There is no way the NT authors tailored their book to match the OT. That would be gullible to believe.
Galatains is NT, my argument was Jesus was not called the seed in the OT. Not the bonus you think it is.
So you believe the Church is infallible and they would never use religion to control people, or edit the bible fo propaganda purposes in order to do so. What do you think they used to control people before m.s.m.?
You are conflating the "church" which is in a state of apostasy as foretold by the Apostle Paul and the writtings in the Bible. If Satan's greatest prize is to corrupt the hearts and minds of a believer than the "Church" is thee greatest place to do so.
Who assembled the Bible? Added, removed books, edited verses ect., pretty sure it was the Church. The Church created the Bible we read today. We at least agree the Church is evil.
There's a few different things to address here. As for the books found within the Bible, Yes I believe they were given under the direction of the Holy Spirit and therfore are solid. As for what we know as the canon, it may suprise you to know there are many books that were in the original 1611 KJV that aren't in today's modern translations. As far as my favorite apocryphal books (Enoch, Jebilees, and Jasher) there are some legitimate discrepancies in them and the reason they weren't included in the "western" Canon, however some were included in the Ethiopian Canon and aren't "hidden" in the sense you can't find them. I read them as a commentary in light of the canon and have gain much for it. Keep in mind the word of God has been under attack also from the beginning.
"Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?"
As for the Church being Evil, I think this is an unfair generalization. Are there Evil people who've used the guise of Christianity or the Church to do horrible things, well of course but there are also Churches who do good in the community.