There is a influx of people who have found Trump and MAGA after RFK Jr's speech and endorsement of Trump.
Many of them have had various levels of TDS, and are finally starting to question what Trump and MAGA is all about. They have lot of concerns and worries.
You see them on social media, especially Twitter, asking questions to us. Just remember, this is what we have been trained for. Put aside all the (well deserved) hate towards the lefties for now and make this count.
God Bless and Have Fun !
This is a good point. Im always on the lookout for shills and assholes looking to troll. I need to start being on the lookout for genuine noobies while also refining my skills on distinguishing between the two.
Stay on the lookout for them, and understand that you have finite time on this planet, and don't want to be wasting it on them.
I used to use this knowledge to reverse troll trolls, responding with a few one liner questions asking for in-depth explanations of things to prove their point, just to waste their time. But now it's almost pointless because they can run your question into an AI text generator like, "Give me a maximum character response to this person's question: '<question>'", and respond in a few seconds.
I have learned to identify straight up chatgpt copy/pastes (good skill to have now so you can call them out on using AI). I do use chatgpt on these people but my process is more like "Point out the fallacies and give me a scathing and damaging response to the user who said: '<paste their full text here>'" Then i pick and choose pieces to respond with, and i never copy paste the full thing. I also remove/edit the parts that trigger the this is ai pattern my mind picks up on, sometimes even run my modification back through asking "Does this look like it was generated by a chat gpt bot? '<paste>'"
In that case, you are stooping to their level.
Much better to take some time to understand the issues yourself.
AI will eventually be designed to ignore important points to an issue that do not align with "muh expert opinion."
Ideally, you should understand the subject yourself -- at least enough to see the flaws in "their" postion (which they also copy and pasted from somewhere). Otherwise, you just have two programmed AI computers having the argument, with no real human involved.
Oh i'm well aware of that. I don't use chatgpt exclusively either, sometimes unfiltered gab.ai (i like it a bit more because it's less 'controlled' and i can get some pretty nasty takes out of that one if need be).
I generally won't respond on something i don't understand, and I am pretty clear not to stoop below a certain point either (i've spent decades finding where that sweet spot is).
Sometimes i just write a 3-4 paragraph reply and then just have the chat whittle it down to a 3-4 sentence packed response.. and modify my response based on that.. the chat isn't always great.. sometimes i need to spend a few more minutes making it tight.