This is blowing up on Twitter.
I'll try to find a good sauce
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Nice straw man and intellectual dishonesty mixed in with a personal attack on my character you POS. F U. Seriously. I mean that with the upmost disrespect. Id sock you in the mouth for that if we were f2f.
I don't support CP or terrorism, I support privacy. The same privacy recognized in the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
You can share child porn and plan terrorism in your home, business, office, church or anywhere else. You can also do it in your mind or in a private conversation away from other people. Should the government be able to monitor that?
Just because somebody wants privacy and security doesn't mean they have anything to hide. I don't consent to searches and I don't answer questions from long enforcement. Because I don't have anything to hide but because that's my god-given right.
Your dumb argument is dumb. Seriously if you want to support totalitarian boot licking you better bring your A game against me. I'm gonna knock your logical fallacies down and make you look stupider than you already look. (Getting kind of hard to do at this point after your last comment since you seem to be giving me a run for my money)
I'd LOVE to live in This fantasy Utopia where we didn't need privacy after the globohomo faggot wicked sociopaths that currently hold power have been delt with..... But untill then should we just route all our communications openly in front of them?
The need for privacy doesn't go away until Jesus returns and sin has been ended.
We have a God given right to privacy. Currently the government doesn't respect that. That doesn't not equate to crime.
Also you seem to be under the assumption that the majority of telegram and encrypted communications is used by terrorists and for child porn and that just shows how wildly ignorant you are.
Telegram has 900 million monthly active users as of 2024.
Signal has roughly 50 million monthly users.
So I guess that's all terrorists and child porn huh?
Go suck an egg.
Well said! u/#correct
First off fuck you too cunt. Fuck your mother. Fuck off. Again, i stand by keeping the government out of our communications. End all.patriot act and illegal spying. You are for keeping an app that is impossible to even get a search warrant and get pedos. That tells me all i need to know about you dick face. Keep saying nasty personal shit. I can do that all day to.
I knocked your arguments dick in the dirt.
My response was upvoted and people agreed with me. Yours was downvoted.
You lashed out like a child / lib.
That tells me everything I need to know.
You do not stand my keeping gov out of our communication. A warrant for communication records is literally the opposite of that.
Retard.
Oh two people liked your post. Whoopee doo. I promise you you will be on the wrong side of the Telegram argument when all is said and done. You do not know me, you do not know what i do and do not know what i know. Telegram is black hat asshole. You will be eating your shitty comments. I am not interested in arguing with someone that supports Telegram, a platform that enables AND facilitates chd exploitation and terrorism. I am 100% for free speech and protected speech. I fought for that right. As I said and have continued to say both can be true at the same time: free, protected and private speech AND eliminating child porn. Just because Pavel was interviewed by Tucker does not make Pavel a white hat, not at all. His is not the next Asange.
Lol 2 people 😂🤣😂🤣 Scroll up retard.
Nice straw-man. IDGAF about telegram in particular. I care about the right to have private conversations and citizens to use encryption and other technologies legally without being considered criminals. I believe in the Constitution and I'm a hardcore libertarian and a Christian theonymous otherwise known as Christian nationalist.
Do you use cash? How about hotels? Do you ever whisper? You enable and support crime and terrorism and child exploitation.
I'm all for eliminating child porn and terrorism but not at the cost of any rights, freedoms, or liberties. That's the guys of totalitarianism and oppression.
A person that's willing to give up liberty for safety deserves neither and is denied both.
Did I say he was a white hat? No. Again another straw man fallacy.
You frankly suck at this. Why don't you head down to your local community college and take a debate class or sign up for one online. You really need to brush up on your ability to think logically.
Inconsistency is the sign of a failed argument and you sir, are inconsistent.
Good day you dumb POS.