If that happens, or has happened, and the main objects of which Q talked are reached, one thing that would certainly have to be done after that is to start work that will hopefully prevent the deep state, or some equivalent, from rising again.
Because that war is something that will not stop. Totalitarianism is something inbuilt in human nature, some of us will always want power over others, and will work to get it. in ways small, or in ways great. And even if we assume that the WHs would now get most of the current group, they will most certainly not get all of them, and with the heads gone, there are going to be underlings who see that not as a deterrent but as an opportunity, to become the new heads.
A movie in a franchise may end up with implication that all then lived happily ever after, the problem is that real life is not a single movie, it's a franchise. A never ending one.
Okay, maybe there will be a second coming one day and a real The End, but for those of you who think these are the end times, remember
“However,” Jesus states, “no one knows the day or hour when these things will happen, not even the angels in heaven or the Son himself. Only the Father knows. And since you don’t know when that time will come, be on guard! Stay alert!”
Christians have been waiting for Jesus's second coming for a couple of thousand years now, and from that, there seems to be no guarantees it would happen now either. So maybe we should just keep working on what we can work on.
I completely agree that the Good vs. Evil fight is never ending, up until Jesus' return and his reign begins. Humanity is deemed to always repeat itself, as we've always been told. I wonder if this could also be tied to the "who ends the endless" post from Q?
I just like to think outside of the box with Q some times, more so than just the current battle, because of the deep spiritual connection Q has and talks about. The world will continue after the battle against the DS is won, and we all need to stay vigilant after the war as to keep Evil in it's new place. So if Q did create drops meant for us after the war, that would mean we have more things to expect, and I couldn't say whether they are good events or bad.
Only time will tell of course, but it is thought provoking seeing some Q posts that may refer to later dates/events further away than we may realize. There are a few more Q posts that made me have these thoughts, I'll have to dig back through them and see if I can find them, and post them here.
Totalitarianism is something inbuilt in human nature
I’d say less Totalitarianism and more a desire for hierarchal structures. And you are confusing certain groups using and manipulating the hierarchal tendencies of people for their own self-interest. As opposed to the group or cultures interests. Such as creating Totalitarian states with themselves on top. As an inbuilt desire for Totalitarianism.
No, I actually mean an inbuilt desire for totalitarianism.
Okay, that is the extreme form. So, more accurately, an inbuilt desire for authoritarianism. At least the definition of totalitarianism I have most often seen is about what Wikipedia uses: "a political system and a form of government that prohibits opposition political parties, disregards and outlaws the political claims of individual and group opposition to the state, and controls the public sphere and the private sphere of society."
Most of us would like to do at least some level of silencing of people who have views that clash badly with ours. And to keep them away from any power in our communities. That is, also, to some extent, absolutely necessary when those views are ones that would clearly damage said societies - using more extreme examples, think something like mixing some extreme types of religious cult beliefs with politics, maybe the Manson family, or School of Prophets, or those people who seem to seriously think that pedophiles should have the right to pursue their desires freely.
But where is the line after which you should not silence somebody? Or strip them of their right to do something like enter politics and try to push their agenda that way? A lot of people who would absolutely deny any desire for a totalitarian society seem still be quite willing to go far enough with strong-arming people who have opinions they don't like that to all purposes the end result might still seem like that at least from some point of views.
I think that that desire to silence people whose opinions you don't like is a pretty strong part of the reasons why we have ended in the mess we are now in the first place. The DS, or any cabal, would not have been able to get as much power as they have if they hadn't been able to get as many people to go along with it as they have. Part of that is the brainwashing and seduction done in schools and through popular culture, but the other part is that desire to make people whose opinions you don't like to shut up. Which pretty much is inbuilt in humans. So, far too many accept that when it happens if given the flimsiest excuse as to why it is necessary, when it's something "their tribe" doesn't like.
If that happens, or has happened, and the main objects of which Q talked are reached, one thing that would certainly have to be done after that is to start work that will hopefully prevent the deep state, or some equivalent, from rising again.
Because that war is something that will not stop. Totalitarianism is something inbuilt in human nature, some of us will always want power over others, and will work to get it. in ways small, or in ways great. And even if we assume that the WHs would now get most of the current group, they will most certainly not get all of them, and with the heads gone, there are going to be underlings who see that not as a deterrent but as an opportunity, to become the new heads.
A movie in a franchise may end up with implication that all then lived happily ever after, the problem is that real life is not a single movie, it's a franchise. A never ending one.
Okay, maybe there will be a second coming one day and a real The End, but for those of you who think these are the end times, remember
“However,” Jesus states, “no one knows the day or hour when these things will happen, not even the angels in heaven or the Son himself. Only the Father knows. And since you don’t know when that time will come, be on guard! Stay alert!”
Christians have been waiting for Jesus's second coming for a couple of thousand years now, and from that, there seems to be no guarantees it would happen now either. So maybe we should just keep working on what we can work on.
I completely agree that the Good vs. Evil fight is never ending, up until Jesus' return and his reign begins. Humanity is deemed to always repeat itself, as we've always been told. I wonder if this could also be tied to the "who ends the endless" post from Q?
I just like to think outside of the box with Q some times, more so than just the current battle, because of the deep spiritual connection Q has and talks about. The world will continue after the battle against the DS is won, and we all need to stay vigilant after the war as to keep Evil in it's new place. So if Q did create drops meant for us after the war, that would mean we have more things to expect, and I couldn't say whether they are good events or bad.
Only time will tell of course, but it is thought provoking seeing some Q posts that may refer to later dates/events further away than we may realize. There are a few more Q posts that made me have these thoughts, I'll have to dig back through them and see if I can find them, and post them here.
I’d say less Totalitarianism and more a desire for hierarchal structures. And you are confusing certain groups using and manipulating the hierarchal tendencies of people for their own self-interest. As opposed to the group or cultures interests. Such as creating Totalitarian states with themselves on top. As an inbuilt desire for Totalitarianism.
No, I actually mean an inbuilt desire for totalitarianism.
Okay, that is the extreme form. So, more accurately, an inbuilt desire for authoritarianism. At least the definition of totalitarianism I have most often seen is about what Wikipedia uses: "a political system and a form of government that prohibits opposition political parties, disregards and outlaws the political claims of individual and group opposition to the state, and controls the public sphere and the private sphere of society."
Most of us would like to do at least some level of silencing of people who have views that clash badly with ours. And to keep them away from any power in our communities. That is, also, to some extent, absolutely necessary when those views are ones that would clearly damage said societies - using more extreme examples, think something like mixing some extreme types of religious cult beliefs with politics, maybe the Manson family, or School of Prophets, or those people who seem to seriously think that pedophiles should have the right to pursue their desires freely.
But where is the line after which you should not silence somebody? Or strip them of their right to do something like enter politics and try to push their agenda that way? A lot of people who would absolutely deny any desire for a totalitarian society seem still be quite willing to go far enough with strong-arming people who have opinions they don't like that to all purposes the end result might still seem like that at least from some point of views.
I think that that desire to silence people whose opinions you don't like is a pretty strong part of the reasons why we have ended in the mess we are now in the first place. The DS, or any cabal, would not have been able to get as much power as they have if they hadn't been able to get as many people to go along with it as they have. Part of that is the brainwashing and seduction done in schools and through popular culture, but the other part is that desire to make people whose opinions you don't like to shut up. Which pretty much is inbuilt in humans. So, far too many accept that when it happens if given the flimsiest excuse as to why it is necessary, when it's something "their tribe" doesn't like.