Right? I’d known they had them before, but it never occurred to me during all of this that those colonial systems might have gone underground, just like the ones ruling us, Canada, Australia, Germany, and others.
Here’s one for thought… we know we still have colonial systems in place. We know that when the left made accusations of Nazi rule, it turned out they were right about that.
Who is running the colonial systems we have? Where are these systems in place at? What are we getting out of those systems that we may be about to lose or have to pay much more to get?
It may be a good idea to get prepared for that, if only mentally, because a huge tightening of the belt is incoming…
I’m really curious what the new, non-mercantilist processes for international sovereignty and trade will look like. Funny how we all think mercantilism is totally a thing of the past, just because our history books said so, when 95% of the things we buy come in on boats and a huge portion of what we produce goes out on boats, but mercantilism was just some old system that men with wigs and pirates did or something, or maybe it means that all production is controlled through merchant ship routes, and financed on debt that can’t be paid off, and all food is poisoned by people who’ve become owned to debt, and all illness from the food is partially de-symptomized through Pharmakeiac sorceries.
Which system is the keystone, and who runs it?
This video is extremely interesting. Side note, I forget which of those countries it was, and am not looking, but if someone were to look around, there have been some very big wars fought over very tiny strips of land, solely to enable access to rivers and ports. There will be this massive, otherwise landlocked country sitting around with a tiny spaghetti-string strip of land hundreds of miles long that ends at the Red Sea. This is significant.
From the looks of it, French Colonialism was actually above ground and yet we did not even know about it. As for the underground colonialism - atleast the clues were there for anyone, especially those living in these colonies. Infact, "neo colonialism" was a favourite term for the liberals until Clinton came along and it became a lefty thing.
But you are right, I think a lot of more direct colonialism by these countries is still under the radar.
Who is running the colonial systems?
The City of London, Vatican, DC triangle with the Zionists in the mix. Ultimately the same Satanic bloodlines.
What are we getting out of those systems that we may be about to lose or have to pay much more to get?
It allows the Satanic agenda of global enslavement by asserting control over all the assets.
However, like everything the Satanists do, because they have to do them from the shadows and atleast initially it has to look and sound good. This has allowed a lot of 3rd world countries to increase their standard of living, atleast in the latter half of neo-colonialism, where Globalism took the reverse turn against the West using immigrants as weapons, which caused a lot of stolen money to be stolen back and flow out of the Western countries.
Overall, without this, the 3rd world countries would not have reached the basic level of development necessary for Great Awakening to become a global movement of freedom.
BTW, international trade itself is nothing nefarious. What matters is who controls it, who funds it, and how much informational imbalance is there between the parties.
In a free world, International Trade is key for prosperity as each country can focus on their own strengths.
In a free world, International Trade is key for prosperity as each country can focus on their own strengths.
That was along the lines of what I was thinking.
Overall, without this, the 3rd world countries would not have reached the basic level of development necessary for Great Awakening to become a global movement of freedom.
Revelation 5:9 - They sang a new song, saying, "You are worthy to take the book, And to open its seals: For you were killed, And bought us for God with your blood, Out of every tribe, language, people, and nation
The City of London, Vatican, DC triangle with the Zionists in the mix. Ultimately the same Satanic bloodlines.
I intended that as a more specific “who”, but yes.
Infact, "neo colonialism" was a favourite term for the liberals until Clinton came along and it became a lefty thing.
Oh nice! I didn’t know that at all. Not surprising, though. Projective demonization until control is gained, then reframe it as a good thing.
The most complex arch and structure always rests on a single stone, which is in and of itself, a very simple thing, no matter how complex actually getting it there was.
Right? I’d known they had them before, but it never occurred to me during all of this that those colonial systems might have gone underground, just like the ones ruling us, Canada, Australia, Germany, and others.
Here’s one for thought… we know we still have colonial systems in place. We know that when the left made accusations of Nazi rule, it turned out they were right about that.
Who is running the colonial systems we have? Where are these systems in place at? What are we getting out of those systems that we may be about to lose or have to pay much more to get?
It may be a good idea to get prepared for that, if only mentally, because a huge tightening of the belt is incoming…
I’m really curious what the new, non-mercantilist processes for international sovereignty and trade will look like. Funny how we all think mercantilism is totally a thing of the past, just because our history books said so, when 95% of the things we buy come in on boats and a huge portion of what we produce goes out on boats, but mercantilism was just some old system that men with wigs and pirates did or something, or maybe it means that all production is controlled through merchant ship routes, and financed on debt that can’t be paid off, and all food is poisoned by people who’ve become owned to debt, and all illness from the food is partially de-symptomized through Pharmakeiac sorceries.
Which system is the keystone, and who runs it?
This video is extremely interesting. Side note, I forget which of those countries it was, and am not looking, but if someone were to look around, there have been some very big wars fought over very tiny strips of land, solely to enable access to rivers and ports. There will be this massive, otherwise landlocked country sitting around with a tiny spaghetti-string strip of land hundreds of miles long that ends at the Red Sea. This is significant.
Great comment, I agree with most of this.
From the looks of it, French Colonialism was actually above ground and yet we did not even know about it. As for the underground colonialism - atleast the clues were there for anyone, especially those living in these colonies. Infact, "neo colonialism" was a favourite term for the liberals until Clinton came along and it became a lefty thing.
But you are right, I think a lot of more direct colonialism by these countries is still under the radar.
The City of London, Vatican, DC triangle with the Zionists in the mix. Ultimately the same Satanic bloodlines.
It allows the Satanic agenda of global enslavement by asserting control over all the assets.
However, like everything the Satanists do, because they have to do them from the shadows and atleast initially it has to look and sound good. This has allowed a lot of 3rd world countries to increase their standard of living, atleast in the latter half of neo-colonialism, where Globalism took the reverse turn against the West using immigrants as weapons, which caused a lot of stolen money to be stolen back and flow out of the Western countries.
Overall, without this, the 3rd world countries would not have reached the basic level of development necessary for Great Awakening to become a global movement of freedom.
BTW, international trade itself is nothing nefarious. What matters is who controls it, who funds it, and how much informational imbalance is there between the parties.
In a free world, International Trade is key for prosperity as each country can focus on their own strengths.
That was along the lines of what I was thinking.
Revelation 5:9 - They sang a new song, saying, "You are worthy to take the book, And to open its seals: For you were killed, And bought us for God with your blood, Out of every tribe, language, people, and nation
I intended that as a more specific “who”, but yes.
Oh nice! I didn’t know that at all. Not surprising, though. Projective demonization until control is gained, then reframe it as a good thing.
...has ' the right to issue ' been taken from the ruling families in Basel - the ' Dracos '
This is an incredible thought.
The most complex arch and structure always rests on a single stone, which is in and of itself, a very simple thing, no matter how complex actually getting it there was.
What is the Keystone?