This article said 36 sealed Indictments are unusual.
You are reading it wrong. It says nearly three dozen sealed criminal indictments have been added to the court docket. It doesn't state how many sealed indictments there are. Only that nearly 3 dozen have been added in a short time.
The CBS article is titled “ There are dozens of sealed criminal indictments on the DC docket. Are they from Mueller?” I think it just means DC and not mationally???
There were just over 300 in Washington (Eastern, aka DC), from your second link. 45k is the total (which you know) not just DC. So, it is a wrong comparison I think. Or is that article talking Nationally? I didn’t see that.
It's an ABC article and it's definitely only DC. But still, if we applied that to all 93 judicial districts. It doesn't come anywhere close to 61,000.
And you would think the DC district court would have more than say, North and South Dakota.
So, it is a wrong comparison I think.
This is basically a giant clue that the theory there 10,000's of sealed Indictments and now half a million sealed Indictments waiting to be acted on is not supported by facts.
Because another fact is. Outsiders cannot count sealed indictments using PACER. There's just no way to tell one sealed court filing from another. Lots of things are sealed and many of them stay sealed.
The latest sealed indictment count of over 500,000 has been verified by quite a few people. There have been videos that showed the Pacer count/screenshot. I don’t think that is a larp.
The problem is you cannot count sealed Indictments that way.
Unless you have insider access to that specific district court, you CANNOT distinguish one sealed proceeding from another.
This is why www.bad-boys.us stopped using "sealed Indictments" and now talks about sealed cases. They changed the language a few years ago, but they didn't go on to educate people on the difference.
The difference means they have no way of knowing how many of those 500,000 sealed cases are Indictments. NONE.
What way can’t you count sealed indictments by? The numbers are there and the database is real. You seem to be obfuscating things with your opinion. That web sire doesn’t come up btw.(edit, no www I see.)
What is the difference between a sealed indictment and sealed case? I would like to see the historical numbers of the latter.
This 'sealed indictments' trope has been going on for quite some time. While I don't doubt that such indictments exist, no one has ever satisfactorily answered the question: Who ARE these people under indictment?
I've heard every speculation out there... common criminals, traitors, Deep State functionaries, etc., but not one single whistle blower who has made a credible ID on any of these folks.
Sealed indictments are meant to protect ongoing investigations, and whistleblowers expose corruption, not sealed legal actions. Expecting names from sealed cases undermines the confidentiality of the legal process. The lack of public details doesn't mean indictments don't exist; it means the process is being followed correctly.
Could this just be the illegal immigrants stacking up over the years? Not showing for amnesty court dates?
Probably not. Indictments only come from grand juries. A judge can just move to deport you.
Anyone have the link to the sealed indictments page?
https://bad-boys.us/
Hmmm ... I cant seem to be able to find DC on this.
So this article argues against the high number of sealed Indictments.
This article said 36 sealed Indictments are unusual.
But this came out several months AFTER people were claiming there were already 25,000 sealed Indictments, a claim going around in early 2018
https://x.com/ItsAngryBob/status/984108499742404608?s=19
By August they were claiming 45,000.
https://imgur.com/a/sealed-indictments-10-30-17-through-7-31-18-U0tRx8w
In November when that article came someone replied to it saying there were 61,000 sealed Indictments
https://x.com/davidurbano/status/1063627150656458753?s=19
So there's a giant disconnect there
You are reading it wrong. It says nearly three dozen sealed criminal indictments have been added to the court docket. It doesn't state how many sealed indictments there are. Only that nearly 3 dozen have been added in a short time.
The CBS article is titled “ There are dozens of sealed criminal indictments on the DC docket. Are they from Mueller?” I think it just means DC and not mationally???
There were just over 300 in Washington (Eastern, aka DC), from your second link. 45k is the total (which you know) not just DC. So, it is a wrong comparison I think. Or is that article talking Nationally? I didn’t see that.
It's an ABC article and it's definitely only DC. But still, if we applied that to all 93 judicial districts. It doesn't come anywhere close to 61,000.
And you would think the DC district court would have more than say, North and South Dakota.
This is basically a giant clue that the theory there 10,000's of sealed Indictments and now half a million sealed Indictments waiting to be acted on is not supported by facts.
Because another fact is. Outsiders cannot count sealed indictments using PACER. There's just no way to tell one sealed court filing from another. Lots of things are sealed and many of them stay sealed.
The latest sealed indictment count of over 500,000 has been verified by quite a few people. There have been videos that showed the Pacer count/screenshot. I don’t think that is a larp.
You misunderstood my “wrong comparison” comment.
The problem is you cannot count sealed Indictments that way.
Unless you have insider access to that specific district court, you CANNOT distinguish one sealed proceeding from another.
This is why www.bad-boys.us stopped using "sealed Indictments" and now talks about sealed cases. They changed the language a few years ago, but they didn't go on to educate people on the difference.
The difference means they have no way of knowing how many of those 500,000 sealed cases are Indictments. NONE.
What way can’t you count sealed indictments by? The numbers are there and the database is real. You seem to be obfuscating things with your opinion. That web sire doesn’t come up btw.(edit, no www I see.)
What is the difference between a sealed indictment and sealed case? I would like to see the historical numbers of the latter.
Sealed-in dyke mends
Phrasal Verb; The locking up of KJP, Muriel Bowser and Donna Brazile as part of the DC cleansing process.
This 'sealed indictments' trope has been going on for quite some time. While I don't doubt that such indictments exist, no one has ever satisfactorily answered the question: Who ARE these people under indictment?
I've heard every speculation out there... common criminals, traitors, Deep State functionaries, etc., but not one single whistle blower who has made a credible ID on any of these folks.
Sealed indictments are meant to protect ongoing investigations, and whistleblowers expose corruption, not sealed legal actions. Expecting names from sealed cases undermines the confidentiality of the legal process. The lack of public details doesn't mean indictments don't exist; it means the process is being followed correctly.