If you like pissing off liberals… Go down the 'Telegony' rabbit hole. It will give you ammo that will short circuit their brains.
You will realize they know it's true when you see fine publications like VICE, Rolling Stone etc attacking people (including scientist) that present the argument, rather than refuting the argument directly. To insult the idea that women's sexual partners leave a genetic marker on them, these 'Journalists' use all the our favorite keywords: "pseudoscience", "misogynistic", "patriarchical", "quackery", "ultra-right wing" etc...
It was known throughout history that male DNA stays inside a woman's body… The sticking point is where does it come from?
Liberals certainly don't want anyone to believe it's from women's sexual partners… Because that would provide REASON to have morals and value purity. It's actually taught in Russian schools now because they did their own experiments and confirmed it. "Russian propaganda"?… Hardly. It's not like they're trying to export the idea.
I'm not disagreeing with the OP at all. This is a separate, albeit parallel idea.
Dig for five minutes. Watch for the keywords. Do you agree with the WOKE, or except that our ancestors were on to something?
"and they shall become one flesh and one blood."
My wife was a virgin and my children are the spitting image of myself. My wife loves me like nothing else in the world. Happiest, most joyful person I've ever met.
I studied this carefully for years. If you're looking to marry, I guarantee you this is worth it to consider friends.
In past multi-year relationships with women who were not virgins, they were rebellious, unstable, unfaithful, and just generally unhappy humans. And the higher body count, the worst the symptoms were.
Some of the most unstable, depressed, "mad at the world", mentally ill women I've known had high a body count… And 'the number' of partners corresponded DIRECTLY with the level of mental instability. It is not a good thing to have so many mens DNA in your brain. It affects your thinking and happiness.
Edit: After rereading my comment I wanted to add some thing… I dated a nice young woman for 2 1/2 years and she had been with two other people before me. She was NOT crazy, not rebellious, and generally quite loving. The last thing I want to do is come off like I'm condemning any woman who is not a virgin. That is an ideal, but I don't want a woman reading this who's been with a few people to feel bad about herself. Your self-esteem is extremely important to your well-being. You are indeed valuable sister. Rather, I'm adding this to illustrate that there is a big difference between a relatively low body count and something much higher which unfortunately it's quite common nowadays.
That's a great question that I was not going to address unless someone pointedly asked it. My research says yeah. When it is put into either of the two lower body orifices, it ends up in the bloodstream and clearly crosses the blood brain barrier because male DNA has been found in the brains of women.
Liberal science is trying desperately to convince us it's from pregnancy, a pregnancy the woman never knew she had, a male twin that was with her in the womb, from an older brother who was in that womb before her etc. etc.… it really makes you laugh when you see how they will bend over backwards to make it Anything but being from a man's seed. There's something extraordinarily, supernaturally powerful about semen.
Researching Telegony years ago pre-Covid was what made me realize for absolute certain what I had already suspected, biological science is a dead science and a dead end that only cares for its own preapproved conclusions.
Behavioral changes in males or females caused by seminal fluid transmission of DNA is a theoretical discussion, not a proven one.
Intestinal parasites can be transmitted via anal sex to male and female, and some can cause behavioral changes. Which one is it that you think is the causative agent only in men?
Good OP!
If you like pissing off liberals… Go down the 'Telegony' rabbit hole. It will give you ammo that will short circuit their brains.
You will realize they know it's true when you see fine publications like VICE, Rolling Stone etc attacking people (including scientist) that present the argument, rather than refuting the argument directly. To insult the idea that women's sexual partners leave a genetic marker on them, these 'Journalists' use all the our favorite keywords: "pseudoscience", "misogynistic", "patriarchical", "quackery", "ultra-right wing" etc...
It was known throughout history that male DNA stays inside a woman's body… The sticking point is where does it come from?
Liberals certainly don't want anyone to believe it's from women's sexual partners… Because that would provide REASON to have morals and value purity. It's actually taught in Russian schools now because they did their own experiments and confirmed it. "Russian propaganda"?… Hardly. It's not like they're trying to export the idea.
I'm not disagreeing with the OP at all. This is a separate, albeit parallel idea.
Dig for five minutes. Watch for the keywords. Do you agree with the WOKE, or except that our ancestors were on to something?
Firmly in the realm of "uncomfortable truths."
"and they shall become one flesh and one blood."
My wife was a virgin and my children are the spitting image of myself. My wife loves me like nothing else in the world. Happiest, most joyful person I've ever met.
I studied this carefully for years. If you're looking to marry, I guarantee you this is worth it to consider friends.
In past multi-year relationships with women who were not virgins, they were rebellious, unstable, unfaithful, and just generally unhappy humans. And the higher body count, the worst the symptoms were.
Some of the most unstable, depressed, "mad at the world", mentally ill women I've known had high a body count… And 'the number' of partners corresponded DIRECTLY with the level of mental instability. It is not a good thing to have so many mens DNA in your brain. It affects your thinking and happiness.
Edit:
After rereading my comment I wanted to add some thing… I dated a nice young woman for 2 1/2 years and she had been with two other people before me. She was NOT crazy, not rebellious, and generally quite loving. The last thing I want to do is come off like I'm condemning any woman who is not a virgin. That is an ideal, but I don't want a woman reading this who's been with a few people to feel bad about herself. Your self-esteem is extremely important to your well-being. You are indeed valuable sister. Rather, I'm adding this to illustrate that there is a big difference between a relatively low body count and something much higher which unfortunately it's quite common nowadays.
This raises the question about sex between men and boys who are raped. Would this also affect their DNA?
That's a great question that I was not going to address unless someone pointedly asked it. My research says yeah. When it is put into either of the two lower body orifices, it ends up in the bloodstream and clearly crosses the blood brain barrier because male DNA has been found in the brains of women.
Liberal science is trying desperately to convince us it's from pregnancy, a pregnancy the woman never knew she had, a male twin that was with her in the womb, from an older brother who was in that womb before her etc. etc.… it really makes you laugh when you see how they will bend over backwards to make it Anything but being from a man's seed. There's something extraordinarily, supernaturally powerful about semen.
Thanks for answering. I came to the same conclusion.
Researching Telegony years ago pre-Covid was what made me realize for absolute certain what I had already suspected, biological science is a dead science and a dead end that only cares for its own preapproved conclusions.
You're entering parasite pill territory. It's not DNA causing the issues between two males.
Behavioral changes in males or females caused by seminal fluid transmission of DNA is a theoretical discussion, not a proven one.
Intestinal parasites can be transmitted via anal sex to male and female, and some can cause behavioral changes. Which one is it that you think is the causative agent only in men?
This really needs to be studied more. Thank you for bringing it to our attention