I listened to the entire clip. He might not be eloquent, but I understand his point. The title is an example of the type of cherry-picking that we hate when libs do it.
The title includes a direct quote that doesn’t need context to comprehend. When he bragged about putting it “bluntly”, the father showed that he cherry picked the clickbait statement himself.
What are you talking about? The father didn't cherry pick anything. Someone else quoted him.
And, yes, the full context is needed to understand. Did you even listen to it and understand his point? He basically said that his son's death was an accident, and that it is wrong to make it political, and that had it been some old white guy it would not have been a topic. Again, he was not very eloquent about it, but the way the tweet on X portrays it is very misleading. So, context matters greatly.
If all he said was "I didn't want my son's death to become a national story" then you'd be right. But that's not what's really upsetting him, he hammered his point that what he really objects to are the 'racists' who are using his son's death as an example of the consequences of unfettered immigration. He's not someone who just wants to be left alone to grieve, he's a liberal cuck who is angry that those gosh darn right wingers were right, and what happened to his son is proof of it.
Maybe. But from the clip what I hear most prominently is that his son's name is being used, whereas if it was not a Haitian driver then no one would have cared.
I listened to the entire clip. He might not be eloquent, but I understand his point. The title is an example of the type of cherry-picking that we hate when libs do it.
I don't agree with his political views, btw.
The title includes a direct quote that doesn’t need context to comprehend. When he bragged about putting it “bluntly”, the father showed that he cherry picked the clickbait statement himself.
What are you talking about? The father didn't cherry pick anything. Someone else quoted him.
And, yes, the full context is needed to understand. Did you even listen to it and understand his point? He basically said that his son's death was an accident, and that it is wrong to make it political, and that had it been some old white guy it would not have been a topic. Again, he was not very eloquent about it, but the way the tweet on X portrays it is very misleading. So, context matters greatly.
If all he said was "I didn't want my son's death to become a national story" then you'd be right. But that's not what's really upsetting him, he hammered his point that what he really objects to are the 'racists' who are using his son's death as an example of the consequences of unfettered immigration. He's not someone who just wants to be left alone to grieve, he's a liberal cuck who is angry that those gosh darn right wingers were right, and what happened to his son is proof of it.
Maybe. But from the clip what I hear most prominently is that his son's name is being used, whereas if it was not a Haitian driver then no one would have cared.