Alaskans, Don't Vote for Mary Peltola
🔍 Notable
https://www.ktoo.org/2024/09/06/the-unseen-factor-driving-alaskas-migration-losses/
Mary Peltola: “Despite the Lower 48 having a very robust discourse on immigration, that has not been Alaska’s challenge,” she said. “Our challenge has been outmigration for over 10 years. In fact, we need J-1 visas like nobody’s business, because we need foreign people to come and help us fill our sectors.”
Peltola actually wants to IMPORT FOREIGNERS while the rest of the country is trying to stem the tide of illegals. Don't vote for her!!
NOTICE TO VOTERS FACING RANKED CHOICE VOTING: Just choose your candidate, and check their box all the way across the page - 1st choice, 2nd choice, 3rd choice, etc. If your candidate is eliminated, no other candidate will receive their votes. It negates the effect of ranked choice voting, and it's the way to "return" to regular voting until we can get RCV voted out.
But what happens if my candidate is removed? I would rather my vote go to my second choice, otherwise it's just lost, right?
Guess what? In normal (not ranked choice), if you vote for someone in a primary and that person loses the primary, your vote is also “just lost”, right?
What kind of leftist propaganda are they spewing up there? 🤦🏻♂️
I'm just saying, I like the idea of voting for my second candidate. Why is this leftist propaganda? The true patriots are often a third option, boxed out by the two wings of the uniparty. Doesn't this allow us to support them without ending up with the worst candidate overall?
It allows them to completely obfuscate the winners and losers. No one will be able to audit a ranked choice election - computers will be required, and where there’s computers, there’s shenanigans going on, guaranteed.
Which is why the left LOVES ranked choice voting, hence the leftist propaganda quip.
One man, one vote. You shouldnt need a flowchart in order to figure out an election.
You can audit them the same way you audit normal election. Just go through the paper ballots, it really isn't that complicated, especially if you know who the top two candidates are.
Then why do we have primaries or run off elections? That is basically the same idea. You vote, some candidates are eliminated, then you vote again.
If you can’t see that ranked choice voting gives the commies yet another way to fuck with elections, I can’t help you.
It sounds like you think run off elections are rigged as well. It just doesn't make sense.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qf7ws2DF-zk
So should we just do approval or rating voting?
In regular voting, you choose one candidate. They either win or lose. If you want your vote to go to someone else if your first candidate loses, then yes, you'd need to put in a different candidate in the second column.
Finnish surname. Unfortunately a lot of the Finnish immigrants you got back about a hundred years ago, even if mostly hard working devout Christians were often also ones who believed in socialism as working solution, and presumably they have transferred that mindset to their offspring even to the current generations too. At least to the point where people with those roots fall way too easily to the propaganda they get in schools, and especially at the university level.
BTW, one of the lures of socialism as an idea to cultures like mine, especially as it was during previous generations, well, fairly small very homogeneous population both genetically and culturally, and with the custom of working together when somebody in the area needed help, helping without getting paid for it because all the people counted on getting the same help themselves if they needed it. So, pretty similar I guess to what your Amish still seem to do.
And a long history of being oppressed by an upper class who were mostly foreigners - Swedish, or later Russians, even if the Russian rule seems to have been less oppressive - or Finns who had abandoned their own in order to fit into those upper classes.
You tell that kind of people that they should kick out all those upper class types and start ruling themselves - power to the people and all that - and they don't think too far about what the system promoted to them actually would be like, or how it would work, but think in terms of that type of collective work, and how things might work at the small community level they are most familiar with, assuming that it would be similar in larger scales too.
How does Alaska end up with cretins like this and Lisa Murkuntski? It's like back in the day, some fully-feldged USSR Communist wanked and shot across the Bering Straight into some libtard bitch's openly waiting Stingray on the other side, and 9 months later Alaska was truly fucked.
The libtards have targeted the population centers of the state hard. Alaskans are independent enough that it's sometimes hard to convince them to work together. They are starting to now, though, between Murkowski, Peltola and ranked choice voting.
We're not.
Alaska uses those damned rigable Dominion machines. Bluehairs are changing the totals after polls close. Just as planned.
Nothing wrong with Legal Migration. Isn't that what shes calling for?
It seems that a lot of people around here don't like legal immigration either
THAT BITCH! 😡
Yes on pro 2 to get rid of rank voting in Alaska, unfortunately, rank voting is in Alaska, a corrupt election center and a very weak Republican Party that’s non existent, Mary will get back in.
https://www.elections.alaska.gov/election-information/#RankedChoice
a little J-1 slave labor never hurt anybody
guessing she doesnt want this white canadian
I know of about 20k Haitians who we could fly up to AK. And maybe they’d try to catch baby bears for sustenance. My sibling is up there ( a 4-6 percenter) and socialism is her utopian fever dream.
still too soon to say who is 4-6%. still a lot of waking up to do
Homer Alaska is a sanctuary city and full blown LGBT
The majority of illegals are from tropical climates ... they couldn't handle 6 months of day and 6 months of night. The criminal element we are seeing, need more than people's possessions - they need easily obtained sustenance. Don't think they are a match for wolves, bears, moose, caribou etc. and angry acclimatized patriots, in order to survive.
I don't know. She is a Democrat, but she is endorsed by the NRA. Having firearms is a protection against tyranny. Maybe she's more of a rogue, someone who the Deep State thinks they can control, but they actually can't. I guess it depends on who she is running against, and why the NRA supports her over her opponents.
Last time I heard of a "sector" was 1984