Keep in mind they’ve been saying the 20 million figure since the early 00’s. There’s been at least another 20 million or so since Biden took office, along with the overstayed H1b visas, and anchor babies.
Trump doesn’t even have to have the military physically remove them all. Just the most dangerous and all the most recent ones like the Haitians and Somalis. Once Trump cuts off all the freebies, such as rent and housing, schools and hospitals, sending our money to family back home, places of business being punished for hiring them, they’ll all self deport.
Then you have the war against the Mexican Cartels Trump plans on engaging in and completely ending their reign of terror in Mexico. If it gets bad enough, Mexico might have its government reformed under Trump’s America’s supervision. At that point, the rest of the Mexicans and Hispanics will self deport back to their now safe home country with plenty of opportunities.
This would completely reverse the planned demographic decline of Whites in America, dramatically reducing the prices of apartments and homes to historic levels, while raising their availability, job opportunities dramatically increase, crime and general number of cars on the road plummets to historic lows, and everything else you can imagine when +40 million extra people are gone.
I’ve explained some of these things to people in my life and they’ve all said I’m likely on to something with these possible outcomes.
The positive effect it would have on the economy, without even touching the FED would be dramatic. Now add auditing and closing the FED/ going to a gold standard on top of everything I’ve already said too.
I don’t think 40 million less people contributing to the economy and paying sales taxes is going to go the way you want
Those 40 million aren't "contributing to the economy." On the contrary, they are a huge drain on it, as well as being an enormous social disruption.
Sorry, but that goes against the basics of how capital works. Cheap, under the table labor provides as much capital for a company as above-board labor while taking less capital in return. It’s a net gain which increases how much capital exists. More capital is good for a capitalist economy.
If we were a more socialist country like in Europe with more expanded social services provided by the government, then at a certain point, yes, access to these services would result in a net loss of capital to the country’s economy as a whole. But we are not those countries - we have very small social safety nets compared to comparable economies, and the amount of capital we put into services that anyone can gain access to without proof of citizenship is absolutely minuscule when compared to the total amount of capital we generate. Even though post-Mao capitalist China will soon overtake us, we are still the largest, most powerful, most advanced economy in world history, and most of that capital stays as capital instead of turning into services for people. We prefer direct kickbacks which in turn generate more capital.
And yes, China is capitalist. “A good cat catches mice” and all that. It’s capitalism where the government has a very strong, demanding, and obvious hand on the wheel, drastically reducing the freedom of individual actors within the economy, but they are undeniably generating OODLES of capital. If we wish to better compete with them in the next trade war, we need more cheap labor generating capital for us, not less.
Hmm, Q. Do you believe in minimum pay? How do you think small businesses survive having to pay 20.00 an hour. A. They don't., your equality is causing disparity and damaging the market. Imagine hospitals having to compete for your patronage. It works just get special interests out of the way.
Federal minimum wage is still seven bucks or something. And that’s not counting tipped jobs, which as you know can be way lower and the tips actually go towards hitting that minimum wage.