Thanks /u/I-am-Orlando
Sauce for both
https://x.com/DocNetyoutube/status/1835340392436285554
https://x.com/DocNetyoutube/status/1835346600559841465
He explains why redactions/delay here
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Then you should forgive someone who wants sources a little beyond a screenshot if a document. At no point did I deny it's validity. I just require more information than a picture of an alleged document. I'm way past the fool me once part of the idiom. Taking things at face value, lest you forget, is how we found ourselves in this mess.
See comment below:
nothingberg 2 points 13 hours ago +2 / -0
It's a very real affidavit of a person who claims to be a witness to debate limitations that were discussed beforehand; and he made this affidavit before the debate even happened and sent them out to various parties before the debate happened.
It said that ABC was going to be able to fact check Trump, meaning they knew ahead of time which questions would be asked and would NOT be asked. Kamala made very specific restrictions on what could be asked and said they could not talk about her time as AG, about her bro in law; and about willie brown stuff I think.
That has also become my understanding of it. Which is how this is supposed to work. Find something interesting, find things that substantiate those things. Step one is utterly useless without step two. Otherwise I could just post a link to "Revolver" each morning, and all of the people who only care about step one could get all excited about the pretend world that they choose to live in. Step one can also be located on any of the main channels and several cable channels as well. Thank you for validating my point. Appreciated.