Thanks. Was searching down the comments for this point. Too many comments with zero checking, zero sourcing, zero application of discernment.
"Someone posts it on X, therefore MUST be true" mentality. It's rather amazing or disappointing, not sure which, why more people don't even think to question the absence of actual facts.
Which part are you having trouble with narrative buster? His dick was flopping around on live tv yet you have an issue with believing a girl who claims to be traffic by this man. Oh you need a Washington post source to confirm it? Go away
Not saying this isn't true folks, but there's zero sourcing or corroboration on this.
Be careful with this one.
Thanks. Was searching down the comments for this point. Too many comments with zero checking, zero sourcing, zero application of discernment.
"Someone posts it on X, therefore MUST be true" mentality. It's rather amazing or disappointing, not sure which, why more people don't even think to question the absence of actual facts.
Which part are you having trouble with narrative buster? His dick was flopping around on live tv yet you have an issue with believing a girl who claims to be traffic by this man. Oh you need a Washington post source to confirm it? Go away
Don't be daft.
The story offers zero sauce. It could be 100% true, or it could be 100% false, and anything in between.
It's funny when people, in the absence of factual evidence, simply go to their biases.
Disinformation is necessary. Kek.
exactly. where do they get this 'news?'