Sorry, but you are spouting nonsense. The only thing that acts like you are describing is a corner-cube reflector, but it will only be reflecting the incident energy, without any focusing. No "time reversal" of the waveform; the leading edge of the wave will still be the leading edge. You can make a phased-array radar act this way, but that will only be radar responding to returns off a target. Phasing the wavefront is "aiming." Radars do not have the power for physical effects on target.
*Friends, u/killerspacerobot is a shining example of a shill. His comment history illustrates it.
Does nothing but sow division, argue, and label as 'nonsense' things that are easily verifiable. I've never seen a comment by you being positive, uplifting, encouraging, or generally contributing to the well-being and high vibes of GAW. Why are you even here?
This has nothing to do with you disagreeing with me (ask around, I like it) but everything to do with the reliable friction you bring to 8/10+ comments you make. Your comment history alone has more total down votes than likes which illustrates your malcontent nature.
The reason why I'm calling you out as a shill u/killerspacerobot is because it's NOT possible for anyone to be this stupid naturally.
I would say you're a bot but that would be insulting bots bc even bots read the comments clearly and comprehend the message.
You can't make a shill understand something when their paycheck depends on them not understanding it.
I concur with this. His old name on this site used to be DeathRayDesigner. He changed his name after he had been discovered as a shill. He now claims he changed his name because he "Lost the password" and he deleted earlier comments where he said the real reason why he changed his name.
He regularly goes to any thread that's having open discussions about technology or advanced sciences and proceeds to sow division. Then he goes on to say understands the science better than anyone because he worked in a similar field. He regularly touts his alleged background in "Aerospace" and has done this repeatedly. Typical shill tactics.
In previous comments he's told he's worked in aerospace field for 50 years. Long time huh? Must mean he's like 70 years old. I've had many argumentative discussions with this shill, and he's not here for open discussion. He never once reinforces a fellow .win users thoughts, or validates anything they write. He only ever attacks people, and their posts.
The discussion was about using this magical device to send the electromagnetic emission back at the emitter. No discussion of any actual weapon other than that. In any case, a "PCM weapon system" is imaginary. I spent decades of my career working on actual beamed weapons, which could not possibly have been directed by radar (too inaccurate)---unless they were microwave weapons. The closest to that we have are anti-drone electronic warfare systems. And, since I have the experience and expertise, I am not impressed with the "downvotes" of the ignorant.
The real reason I am downvoted around here is not because what I have to say is wrong (all the discussions end with sputtering and cursing on the other party's part) but because I am challenging ignorance and stupidity. I don't defer to them. I don't give Flat-Earthers or Moon-Hoaxers any credit, because they are simply ignorant and antagonistic to learning. (The latest nonsense is the posting of a "theory" that nuclear weapons are being used in current conflicts---when the video they show is clearly that of conventional explosions. Including the "sparkles" from delayed detonation of secondary munitions. I've seen these explosions repeatedly from coverage of Ukraine.)
You seem to want an atmosphere where everyone gets on board with the "consensus theory" of the day and doesn't rock the boat. I don't know why you would want to side up with crackpot theories and act like your own little universe of normies clinging to a "narrative". You don't like it when I kick your flimsy theories in the brisket. Asking questions is deemed virtuous, except when the questions are turned on theories. You don't bother to read any of my uplifting stuff, such as it has been, but I do get upvotes from time to time.
You want to call me a "shill" because you are also reduced to bad-mouthing. You couldn't prove I am a shill if the lives of your loved ones depended on it. It is a totally empty epithet. I know it, and you know it.
Sorry, but you are spouting nonsense. The only thing that acts like you are describing is a corner-cube reflector, but it will only be reflecting the incident energy, without any focusing. No "time reversal" of the waveform; the leading edge of the wave will still be the leading edge. You can make a phased-array radar act this way, but that will only be radar responding to returns off a target. Phasing the wavefront is "aiming." Radars do not have the power for physical effects on target.
"If you can see a target through a rifle scope within range, you could hit it."
Does this mean I'm saying 'the rifle scope is the weapon'?
Did I say the radar was the weapon?
Or did I say if you can get a radar return, a PCM weapon system can take it out?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase_conjugation
http://slehar.com/wwwRel/PhaseConjugate/PhaseConjugate.html
*Friends, u/killerspacerobot is a shining example of a shill. His comment history illustrates it.
Does nothing but sow division, argue, and label as 'nonsense' things that are easily verifiable. I've never seen a comment by you being positive, uplifting, encouraging, or generally contributing to the well-being and high vibes of GAW. Why are you even here?
This has nothing to do with you disagreeing with me (ask around, I like it) but everything to do with the reliable friction you bring to 8/10+ comments you make. Your comment history alone has more total down votes than likes which illustrates your malcontent nature.
The reason why I'm calling you out as a shill u/killerspacerobot is because it's NOT possible for anyone to be this stupid naturally.
I would say you're a bot but that would be insulting bots bc even bots read the comments clearly and comprehend the message.
You can't make a shill understand something when their paycheck depends on them not understanding it.
I concur with this. His old name on this site used to be DeathRayDesigner. He changed his name after he had been discovered as a shill. He now claims he changed his name because he "Lost the password" and he deleted earlier comments where he said the real reason why he changed his name.
He regularly goes to any thread that's having open discussions about technology or advanced sciences and proceeds to sow division. Then he goes on to say understands the science better than anyone because he worked in a similar field. He regularly touts his alleged background in "Aerospace" and has done this repeatedly. Typical shill tactics.
In previous comments he's told he's worked in aerospace field for 50 years. Long time huh? Must mean he's like 70 years old. I've had many argumentative discussions with this shill, and he's not here for open discussion. He never once reinforces a fellow .win users thoughts, or validates anything they write. He only ever attacks people, and their posts.
There are more. Certain ones only come out to gate-keep/contain certain sensitive topics.
Apparently It's all they have the resources to do anymore.
Try mentioning the philosopher stone and how it's a real thing. They will come out like cockroaches with the lights off.
I recommend keeping a list if this is something you have a keen enough eye to spot.
🎶 Shills-a-plenty 🎶
The discussion was about using this magical device to send the electromagnetic emission back at the emitter. No discussion of any actual weapon other than that. In any case, a "PCM weapon system" is imaginary. I spent decades of my career working on actual beamed weapons, which could not possibly have been directed by radar (too inaccurate)---unless they were microwave weapons. The closest to that we have are anti-drone electronic warfare systems. And, since I have the experience and expertise, I am not impressed with the "downvotes" of the ignorant.
The real reason I am downvoted around here is not because what I have to say is wrong (all the discussions end with sputtering and cursing on the other party's part) but because I am challenging ignorance and stupidity. I don't defer to them. I don't give Flat-Earthers or Moon-Hoaxers any credit, because they are simply ignorant and antagonistic to learning. (The latest nonsense is the posting of a "theory" that nuclear weapons are being used in current conflicts---when the video they show is clearly that of conventional explosions. Including the "sparkles" from delayed detonation of secondary munitions. I've seen these explosions repeatedly from coverage of Ukraine.)
You seem to want an atmosphere where everyone gets on board with the "consensus theory" of the day and doesn't rock the boat. I don't know why you would want to side up with crackpot theories and act like your own little universe of normies clinging to a "narrative". You don't like it when I kick your flimsy theories in the brisket. Asking questions is deemed virtuous, except when the questions are turned on theories. You don't bother to read any of my uplifting stuff, such as it has been, but I do get upvotes from time to time.
You want to call me a "shill" because you are also reduced to bad-mouthing. You couldn't prove I am a shill if the lives of your loved ones depended on it. It is a totally empty epithet. I know it, and you know it.