At least I've read Heiden's account, which he hasn't, nor have you. My opinion of you is what has kept you in this exchange. You are trying to defend your ridiculous position in rational conversation...and failing.
Ritual murder? A long history of the same at the hands of committed atheists (Ted Bundy, etc.). So, you generalize from specific instances to a whole people? That's collectivism, pal. All Italians are Mafia. All Germans are Nazis. Even a third-grader would find a logical problem with that.
I don't have a Satanic cult, thanks for so ennobling me. I will be happy enough for justice to find the guilty.
I looked up the three cases you mention. They are all flimsy, relying on confessions under torture, confusion, and the absence of a body. There is a long history of the ALLEGATION of murder at Jewish hands; this is called the Blood Libel.
Wise words. Another point in strategic planning is the necessity and urgency of effecting those changes that will be either impossible or exceedingly difficult to reverse. It is the old story of burning the bridges behind you, or burning your ships on the shore, so that forward motion is the only thing possible. I"m not worried so much about the loyalty and dedication of Trumps troops (nice alliteration), as I am about the ability, time, and effort needed for the Deep State to rebuild those bridges for a way back to the previous condition.
I am also getting more convinced, upon reflection, that the arrests and trials should begin with key news personalities, to reveal their ties and complicities with the Deep State, as a basis for impeaching their veracity and integrity. Once the MSM is disrupted and thrown into disrepute, the Deep State will have lost their voice.
And, generally, Trump & Co. need to operate faster than the Deep State's OODA loop (Col. John Boyd, RIP: observe-orient-decide-act). He needs to get ahead of their capability to respond. Aggressive on all fronts. This may be where Musk can perform signal duty, since he seems to have a knack for thinking outside-the-box and conceiving grand maneuvers.
It is a small matter when the person making the statement is uninformed and is only repeating hearsay, from what source he does not name. You are placing far too much credibility in a casual, questionable statement. You are easily swayed if it smells like your bias ("what delightful perfume").
The protocols are as legitimate as Victor Hugo's novels, but just as fictional. (In other words, there are no authentic Elders as their authors.) You've lost this round.
Jews murdering children? Evidence? And you believe the end (pogroms of Jews) justifies the means (lying)? It will be hard to find anything on Epstein's island, considering he filled the underground spaces with concrete.
You might as well give it up. You are building your house of cards on jello, and looking more ridiculous as you continue.
When, in reading, I came across "Trump administration," I autocorrected it to read "Trump Organization." Genius move. Start out with impeccable operational security. Now that I think about it, this move reminds me of a classic corporate hostile takeover. I wonder if Elon Musk was an inspiration.
Somebody needs to do a functional allocation analysis, of denominating explicitly which laws (by statute) are being enforced and by what department (and budget). And then get into that agency and break down the enforcement allocation by agency (and budget). And then by section, and so forth. This is the sort of thing that can be retrospectively compared to past budgets and staffing levels, and can be used for "what if" reductions or alterations in future allocations. But hey, this is how we thought when we went to the Moon...
The right to exist is surely challenged by the neighboring nations, who have tried multiple times to obliterate Israel. Even now, with Hamas, and their vile slogan of cleansing Israel of Jews from the mountains to the sea. You be the one to guarantee peace for Israel, and we will stand back and watch.
You are truly kidding, here. Lavrov was making an uninformed off-the cuff remark. It means nothing and is refuted by the facts. Hitler's birth circumstances are well-documented.
The Old Testament is full of examples of both faithful and faithless Hebrews. It was a recurrent problem, leading to the manifestation of Jesus Christ. There is no way that any of this justifies a collectivist view of the Jews. Unless, of course, you are simply a disciple of collectivism. You have companions on that side of life.
The FBI website is a royal laugh on you. There is no doubt that the Protocols are "real", in the sense of an actual written document, and I never said they didn't exist. The point is: it was forged as agitprop by the Tsar's Okhrana as a derogation against the Jews for the facilitation of pogroms. In the sense of being "real" as an authentic document, it is trash. This is all spelled out in lengthy documented detail by Konrad Heiden in his "The Fuehrer" (1944). Ha, ha. You've been taken in by one of history's most notorious lies. It seems appropriate. You chastise people to not be taken in by lies, and here you are---
Hitler was Austrian, but what would facts matter in your imaginary universe. His view of Jews was pretty indistinguishable from yours. He wasn't so picky about distinctions between types of Jews. I have no idea what difference is supposed to exist between "torah Jews" and "talmudic Jews", since there should be no discord between torah and talmud. I suspect you don't have any idea, either. And if you are listening to Russia on the subject of the Jews, do you put credence in the alleged "Protocols of the Elders of Zion"?
I think it is far too ambiguous to interpret. "Saving" can be taken in two ways. In one way, it is related to salvation, or the rescue of someone from a threat. Which would suggest that Israel's future is to be saved. For someone that embarked on the Abraham Accords, that would seem to be an expectable goal. In another way, it can be related to deprioritization, or the leaving of some task to the last. Which would suggest that whatever problems are to be solved for Israel, it may require that the other problems be solved first. Considering that the politics of Israel may be entwined with the politics of the U.S., that may be the case. It could well mean both interpretations.
I have never understood what that phrase is supposed to mean, and I think many on this page read into it their own prejudices. I think it is clear that Trump regards Israel with the deepest religious respect, and I have no problem with that.
"The Jews." Next, you will be telling me that Hitler had "the right idea." And you think it is a cosmic lark. But you don't give a farthing for someone who saved many lives, so that is your defining characteristic.
For them, it is more about domination of the press, not freedom of the press. They have no independence of thought, anyway. Their objection is to any loss of that domination. They covet the power of the veto, not the power of a new idea.
As we are seeing, even with a Constitution, they are tyrants. What does a Constitution matter if no one respects it? The nation and its feckless people are in deep trouble, even with Trump at the helm.
Looks like it is time for you to lose a lot of sleep.
Which is why those who feel this way are bound by integrity to join with organizations such as the National Rifle Association (NRA), or Gun Owners of America (GOA), or Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO)...in order of increasing firmness of principle.
Our freedoms dwindle away from the unwillingness of people to oppose it through political means. ("Oh, too messy." "Oh, I don't have the time." "Oh, I have more important things to do.") They substitute violence fantasies for actually doing anything to stop the backslide, and to make progress for freedom. Talk is not only cheap...it is cheapest.
At the fall of the Soviet Union, the Warsaw Pact nations also had a wave of liberation. In Romania, Ceausescu was shot by a firing squad. There were news photos of the general events, and one in particular stuck in my mind. I wish to heaven it were possible to find. It was a scene of workers in a newspaper printing shop, laying up the first freely-printed newspaper---all of them with AK-47 rifles slung across their backs. To prevent anyone interfering with free expression! A more perfect fusion of the meaning of the 1st and 2nd Amendments I cannot bring to mind.
Now, upon thinking on that, I am wondering if it is wrong to insist that crowds drawn together for freedom of speech should be denied the carriage of arms.
Yeah. And all Italians are Mafia. All Germans are Nazis. All Russians are Communists. All Japanese are Imperialists. Just because a few people say a few things, you are taking that as reality? There are probably red-headed murderers out there, too. Gonna give the redheads the stink-eye?
So, a guy who promoted a Covid cure that likely saved thousands of lives doesn't mean that much to you---but you are willing to denounce him being a Jew. I guess hatred means more to you than gratitude.
It seems in eastern Africa generally that Bill Gates has a low reputation, on account of his previous philanthropic escapades. Too many bad experiences...with family members. They say an elephant never forgets...but where do you suppose the elephants come from?
What is the difference? I am a communicator as a professional byproduct in science and engineering. I know how to put it down on paper with references. Listening to anything takes 5x more time than reading, and it is much more difficult to check sources. I am not impressed by videos. They make me believe that literacy has dropped off the map of the intelligentsia (talk and wave arms at the cave pictures).
No thanks. There are plenty of anti-Semites around here that can give me all kinds of reasons for being concerned about a world of Zionists.
Thanks. Good catch. I don't have much to do with Stu Peters, so my ear was not attuned to his name. (Actually, I think my hearing deficit got the better of me and it just passed by.)
He had 8.5 minutes to name key names and failed to do so (with one exception, thanks to "RealityIsBroken"). That denotes a complete lack of sincere seriousness. I'm not interested in rabbit holes. Honest communication gets to the point and does not demand elaborate, time-consuming research.
I will confess not understanding his point. On the one hand, these voices are anti-Israel, which he approves. But they are anti-Trump, which he disapproves. But Trump is pro-Israel...so, what in hell is he really approving? You don't see this?
The "very important point of dual US/Israel citizens" can be brought out in a few sentences, or even one sentence. He didn't bother to make the point. Nor did you.
As is so often the case, Jews are prominent in businesses where gentiles are not. It is because, as a people, they are exceptionally talented and capable. Which is really the only reason why gentiles hate the Jews, from simple envy. And who ever gave you the ridiculous idea that I was "running into the arms" of the drug industry?
The reason that HCQ was known about before Covid had nothing to do with Covid (antimalarial etc.). But that's why he picked it out EARLY in the scheme of things, just like doctor Raoult in France. He was not the only advocate, by a long shot (if you had been paying attention). There is a reason for picking it (being a zinc ionophore). I don't suppose you understand why that is key. Along with picking zinc and an antibiotic.
So far, all you have is prejudicial suspicion, and seeking a ground over which to put it. In your usage, "the noahide laws" are just nonsense syllables. I looked at them; they are compatible with the Ten Commandments (or even merely a restatement). There is no basis for angst. Either you explain what law you wish to break, or drop the subject. I would be more impressed if you shook the wing of a crow at me.
The treaty obligations are in force only if other NATO members are ATTACKED. It seems to me the treaty is null and void if a group of NATO members decide to incite war against anyone else. (We had a bad precedent in the Serbia-Kosovo War, however.)
Because he was one of the first on the scene, after Didier Raoult, who identified a cure for Covid-19, when everyone else had their hair on fire. He may have saved thousands of lives by making his announcements. Suspicious that you give that no account.
All I know is that you have "Jews" in your target sight, and haven't provided a single reason to think ill of him.
An 8 1/2 minute video about false voices and he does not NAME ANYONE. He leaves it up to us to go looking for spooks in a haunted house.
These misleading voices are somehow telling the truth about Israel, but are lying through their teeth about Trump. If they are opposed to Trump, and Trump is an enemy of the Zionist Cabal, why do they also expose the Zionist Cabal?
And, there are Zionists under every bed, apparently. Most of America was settled with the Geneva and King John versions of the Bible. No credit for Jews who put their names to financial support of the War for Independence.
And the icing on this cake of conspiracy is "chemtrails," something that has only an imaginary existence, but because it is such a refined taste, allows him to display an "I'm one of you" marker.
If I were looking for manipulation actors, I would vote for this guy.
No, who cares about what Jewish lore he believes in? What is there "suspicious" about something that is clearly Old Testament and consistent with the Ten Commandments? He also wears a beard. Is that suspicious, too? It could be you are just filled with unfounded suspicions.
This sounds good. It would be wild if Trump relocated the briefing venue to a large lecture hall and let in a whole lot of press and podcast representatives. Talk about transparency and inclusion. Then if you get most of the audience reporting on the same tune, the outliers would be disregarded. I may not have all the dynamics in view, but I let you all sort that out.