If an American citizen, CA resident, and eligible voter already has a valid ID and uses it to comply with CA’s existing voter ID requirement, then an additional local voter ID requirement wouldn’t be an obstacle or an imposition
It would depend on what that additional requirement was.
“low… information resources” is their way of euphemizing ‘uninformed and unresourceful’.
Actually there are proven fewer resources available to them. Communities are built on the resources available, which is why most often the best towns/neighborhoods have good access to public education and resources. Well maintained roads, responsive emergency services, green space, etc. All things that are funded by taxpayers and built/maintained by the government.
Historically, in predominantly black communities, there was not as much government spending going into those communities. They had fewer resources and have struggled as communities, historically, because of it, and those struggles carry over to present day.
How concerned for black Americans’ supposed lack of ID resources were the Democrats in the 20th century when the logistics of getting an ID might’ve actually been more difficult and blacks had less wealth, but when there were also far fewer non-citizens in the US?
Probably not concerned enough! So hopefully those democrats are getting voted out of office. Most of them are probably dead though, considering I think you're talking about 60 years ago, so it's good that things are changing in favor of making more resources available so that we can have more high functioning communities.
It would depend on what that additional requirement was.“
It’s only “additional” in the sense that the requirement would be local and statewide. The requirement itself remains the same: voter ID. So it’s redundant. The commies aren’t afraid of redundancy. They’re afraid of the enforcement of any voter ID law.
Black Americans have said themselves that getting valid ID is easy and that virtually all functioning black American adults have already done it.
You don’t have to go back 60 years to notice the dearth of crybabying about ID resources. That line of complaint only started in the last few election cycles. In 2004, “Republican” George W Bush supposedly won 40% of the hispanic vote. Democrats had less to gain by risking the exposure of getting non-citizen hispanics to vote, so they had less reason to use black Americans as an excuse for not making hispanics show ID.
Democrats and RINOs have been using blacks as an excuse for resource embezzlement since before LBJ’s “Great Society” commie bullshit. From that time until about 2016 the commies didn’t mention voter ID laws being unfair, because they weren’t. Now we have millions of illegals in the country and in CA, more of whom are hispanic than black, and suddenly the commies claim that voter ID is a problem for black American citizens. It’s total bs.
Black Americans have said themselves that getting valid ID is easy and that virtually all functioning black American adults have already done it.
Lol you took a survey or something?
Democrats had less to gain by risking the exposure of getting non-citizen hispanics to vote, so they had less reason to use black Americans as an excuse for not making hispanics show ID.
Then I'm glad to see the new leaders we've elected since then show proper concern with making sure everyone has accessible resources to get their ID.
Laws may not have changed much, but resources have.
Not me, but other people have taken surveys. Lol at your lol.
You can do better than a survey and look up the percentages of black Americans over 18 yo in different states who have valid ID. DHS probably has all the numbers but I’m not sure they would share because they’re commies and the real numbers would blast a hole in their commie speaking point.
Then I'm glad to see the new leaders we've elected since then show proper concern with making sure everyone has accessible resources to get their ID.“
You’re acting as if this is a bill to build a new Department of Motor Vehicles location in Compton, South Central. It’s not. It’s just a bill that uses black Americans as a false excuse to reduce the chances that non-citizens who mostly aren’t black are required to show valid ID to vote.
Not me, but other people have taken surveys. Lol at your lol.
Ah, the classic "I don't have sources but you can try and look them up yourself with my vague claim and if you can't find them then you just aren't looking hard enough/the data was deleted."
That's a tiresome tactic, I'll be real.
You’re acting as if this is a bill to build a new Department of Motor Vehicles location in Compton, South Central. It’s not
I'm well aware it's not. But you're saying that democrats are concerned about it now but weren't then. I see this as a positive and something I agree with. I would certainly much rather there be more resources added, but citizens shouldn't be punished because the government failed to provide substantial resources.
It would depend on what that additional requirement was.
Actually there are proven fewer resources available to them. Communities are built on the resources available, which is why most often the best towns/neighborhoods have good access to public education and resources. Well maintained roads, responsive emergency services, green space, etc. All things that are funded by taxpayers and built/maintained by the government.
Historically, in predominantly black communities, there was not as much government spending going into those communities. They had fewer resources and have struggled as communities, historically, because of it, and those struggles carry over to present day.
Probably not concerned enough! So hopefully those democrats are getting voted out of office. Most of them are probably dead though, considering I think you're talking about 60 years ago, so it's good that things are changing in favor of making more resources available so that we can have more high functioning communities.
It’s only “additional” in the sense that the requirement would be local and statewide. The requirement itself remains the same: voter ID. So it’s redundant. The commies aren’t afraid of redundancy. They’re afraid of the enforcement of any voter ID law.
Black Americans have said themselves that getting valid ID is easy and that virtually all functioning black American adults have already done it.
You don’t have to go back 60 years to notice the dearth of crybabying about ID resources. That line of complaint only started in the last few election cycles. In 2004, “Republican” George W Bush supposedly won 40% of the hispanic vote. Democrats had less to gain by risking the exposure of getting non-citizen hispanics to vote, so they had less reason to use black Americans as an excuse for not making hispanics show ID.
Democrats and RINOs have been using blacks as an excuse for resource embezzlement since before LBJ’s “Great Society” commie bullshit. From that time until about 2016 the commies didn’t mention voter ID laws being unfair, because they weren’t. Now we have millions of illegals in the country and in CA, more of whom are hispanic than black, and suddenly the commies claim that voter ID is a problem for black American citizens. It’s total bs.
Lol you took a survey or something?
Then I'm glad to see the new leaders we've elected since then show proper concern with making sure everyone has accessible resources to get their ID.
Laws may not have changed much, but resources have.
Not me, but other people have taken surveys. Lol at your lol.
You can do better than a survey and look up the percentages of black Americans over 18 yo in different states who have valid ID. DHS probably has all the numbers but I’m not sure they would share because they’re commies and the real numbers would blast a hole in their commie speaking point.
You’re acting as if this is a bill to build a new Department of Motor Vehicles location in Compton, South Central. It’s not. It’s just a bill that uses black Americans as a false excuse to reduce the chances that non-citizens who mostly aren’t black are required to show valid ID to vote.
Ah, the classic "I don't have sources but you can try and look them up yourself with my vague claim and if you can't find them then you just aren't looking hard enough/the data was deleted."
That's a tiresome tactic, I'll be real.
I'm well aware it's not. But you're saying that democrats are concerned about it now but weren't then. I see this as a positive and something I agree with. I would certainly much rather there be more resources added, but citizens shouldn't be punished because the government failed to provide substantial resources.