There shouldn’t be any financial requirement to vote, even if it’s just a dollar.”
There isn’t any direct financial requirement to vote. It’s not a poll tax. It’s an indirect expense that’s for processing an ID. This wasn’t as necessary before Hart-Cellar, and especially before Democrats’ and RINOs’ open border.
If you’re not buying the idea that black Americans are unable to acquire and budget $25, then you have no argument left.
I don’t have to do any work, I’m not trying to enable election fraud with bullshit legislation.
If a citizen doesn’t vote there’s a good chance it was voluntary, but if a noncitizen votes, his vote automatically and necessarily nullifies a citizen’s vote, which involuntarily disenfranchises that citizen. If it was sincere and not just a bullshit enablement of fraud, your crybabying about a possible few citizens “disenfranchised” by lack of ID would be an example of lack of perception of scale, because many more citizens are disenfranchised by noncitizen votes than by lack of ID.
Aren’t you bored yet? You can’t prove the need for this bill so you’re asking me to prove it for you and repeating yourself and doing troll tactics. It’s going to be moot anyway in five weeks. This is a Q and Trump site. When Q said they have it all, do you believe it? Maybe military intelligence, space force, the NSA, etc had the technology to track every vote in 2020 so they know how many illegal votes were cast and how many noncitizens voted. A hypothesis is that they’ve been sitting on the info as part of a sting operation to see who else will get caught in the cover up. Let’s see how that goes, and in the meantime, enjoy your last days of goofy trolling.
Spoken like a true lazy conversationalist. Just wants to imagine how the world works and doesn't want to verify it, only claim that it's "probably" correct and demand others send proof that they're wrong
Aren’t you bored yet?
Yeah, I am now. It's boring talking to someone who refuses to look at facts, and just wants to speculate and imagine how the world works
You can feel free to have a little tirade in response about how "I don't have any argument left" when you've refused to actually understand my points and look at the data I've provided for you.
Just because I disagree with you, doesn't make it trolling. I'm giving you logic and reason and you refuse to look.
How many votes were actually cast and counted by illegals in past elections? I'm assuming you don't know, and your answer is "PrObAbLy A LoT!1!" but will refuse to actually look further, because you just want to be afraid.
I didn’t demand any proof from you that DMV’s don’t waive fees for the poor, I just took your word for it. That’s the issue that I used “probably” about as an afterthought. The main point was that it’s possible for them to start waiving fees if they want to. And you know that. Now you’re acting like I used “probably” for other things. That’s another example of your lack of integrity. Just like when I didn’t care about your age, you acted like I don’t care about anything, lol. Before lecturing about work ethic and research and proving other peoples’ claims for them, how about you just stop being a bad faith liar. That’s why you’re a troll. It’s not because you disagreed with me. And you probably already know that too but this is just the next level of your disingenuous trolling.
You haven’t used logic and reason. You just linked some shit and asked me to apply logic and reason to it. Do it yourself. There’s no need for this bill, prove me wrong.
If there’s anything you can take away from this thread, it’s this piece of trolling advice: if you want to trick people into clicking on your links, don’t get caught in blatant lies. Better luck, better luck, better luck next time
Bud copy and paste the url if you’re scared of clicking the link. You’re just making excuses. Pretending I’m “tricking” you just because you won’t actually look for data.
Your attempt at explaining your stats has no chance of getting your device infected with malware, no chance of getting your name on the cp registry, and no chance of rewarding some site with another visitor click if you’ve already been counted as a visitor. You have nothing to be afraid of except your own failure.
Going to your website might expose me to those risks. It’s not worth it to try to prove your point for you.
I doubt you’re suddenly going to get the guts to quote stats and explain them, but I figure you want to get the last word even if it’s repetitive, so have at it. Goofy, repetitive, unsubstantial “last word” reply in 3, 2, …
The movie clip isn’t relevant to the topic. It’s just me making fun of your dumb attempt at trickery.
I’m not clicking your link. Paste the data here and I’ll look at it. You refused to cite two stats or even one stat, so you’ve made your audience’s confidence in you lower than your own. Anyway, I don’t just want naked data. I want to see you try to explain how it helps your case. You know that and you’re afraid to try.
Genuinely, you think a link to a research site will give you CP and put you on a watch list?
Christ dude. No wonder you’re uninformed. You’re so paranoid you believe all your fears without any logic. Do you even go outside your home? Do you have newspaper over your windows so spies don’t see you?
I’m surprised you’re even on the internet at all.
I know the “last word” bit is fun, but we both know it’s a cop out. You’re too afraid to actually look at data that may compromise your precious imagined worldview.
There isn’t any direct financial requirement to vote. It’s not a poll tax. It’s an indirect expense that’s for processing an ID. This wasn’t as necessary before Hart-Cellar, and especially before Democrats’ and RINOs’ open border.
If you’re not buying the idea that black Americans are unable to acquire and budget $25, then you have no argument left.
I don’t have to do any work, I’m not trying to enable election fraud with bullshit legislation.
If a citizen doesn’t vote there’s a good chance it was voluntary, but if a noncitizen votes, his vote automatically and necessarily nullifies a citizen’s vote, which involuntarily disenfranchises that citizen. If it was sincere and not just a bullshit enablement of fraud, your crybabying about a possible few citizens “disenfranchised” by lack of ID would be an example of lack of perception of scale, because many more citizens are disenfranchised by noncitizen votes than by lack of ID.
Aren’t you bored yet? You can’t prove the need for this bill so you’re asking me to prove it for you and repeating yourself and doing troll tactics. It’s going to be moot anyway in five weeks. This is a Q and Trump site. When Q said they have it all, do you believe it? Maybe military intelligence, space force, the NSA, etc had the technology to track every vote in 2020 so they know how many illegal votes were cast and how many noncitizens voted. A hypothesis is that they’ve been sitting on the info as part of a sting operation to see who else will get caught in the cover up. Let’s see how that goes, and in the meantime, enjoy your last days of goofy trolling.
Spoken like a true lazy conversationalist. Just wants to imagine how the world works and doesn't want to verify it, only claim that it's "probably" correct and demand others send proof that they're wrong
Yeah, I am now. It's boring talking to someone who refuses to look at facts, and just wants to speculate and imagine how the world works
You can feel free to have a little tirade in response about how "I don't have any argument left" when you've refused to actually understand my points and look at the data I've provided for you.
Just because I disagree with you, doesn't make it trolling. I'm giving you logic and reason and you refuse to look.
How many votes were actually cast and counted by illegals in past elections? I'm assuming you don't know, and your answer is "PrObAbLy A LoT!1!" but will refuse to actually look further, because you just want to be afraid.
Good luck with all that!
I didn’t demand any proof from you that DMV’s don’t waive fees for the poor, I just took your word for it. That’s the issue that I used “probably” about as an afterthought. The main point was that it’s possible for them to start waiving fees if they want to. And you know that. Now you’re acting like I used “probably” for other things. That’s another example of your lack of integrity. Just like when I didn’t care about your age, you acted like I don’t care about anything, lol. Before lecturing about work ethic and research and proving other peoples’ claims for them, how about you just stop being a bad faith liar. That’s why you’re a troll. It’s not because you disagreed with me. And you probably already know that too but this is just the next level of your disingenuous trolling.
You haven’t used logic and reason. You just linked some shit and asked me to apply logic and reason to it. Do it yourself. There’s no need for this bill, prove me wrong.
If there’s anything you can take away from this thread, it’s this piece of trolling advice: if you want to trick people into clicking on your links, don’t get caught in blatant lies. Better luck, better luck, better luck next time
Bud copy and paste the url if you’re scared of clicking the link. You’re just making excuses. Pretending I’m “tricking” you just because you won’t actually look for data.
That’s the same thing.
Your attempt at explaining your stats has no chance of getting your device infected with malware, no chance of getting your name on the cp registry, and no chance of rewarding some site with another visitor click if you’ve already been counted as a visitor. You have nothing to be afraid of except your own failure.
Going to your website might expose me to those risks. It’s not worth it to try to prove your point for you.
I doubt you’re suddenly going to get the guts to quote stats and explain them, but I figure you want to get the last word even if it’s repetitive, so have at it. Goofy, repetitive, unsubstantial “last word” reply in 3, 2, …
I did, you opted not to look at the link. It's to a research site.
Here's the full URL:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328840301_The_Racial_Implications_of_Voter_Identification_Laws_in_America
You didn’t prove anything. Go on, use your big boy words and explain how your stats help you to enable noncitizen voting
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328840301_The_Racial_Implications_of_Voter_Identification_Laws_in_America
Once you’ve actually looked at them we can talk
Why don’t you eat up and we’ll tell you
A movie clip is Irrelevant. My link actually has data.
If we’re just gonna go in circles of you wanting supporting data but refuse to look at it, I don’t know what else we can do here
The movie clip isn’t relevant to the topic. It’s just me making fun of your dumb attempt at trickery.
I’m not clicking your link. Paste the data here and I’ll look at it. You refused to cite two stats or even one stat, so you’ve made your audience’s confidence in you lower than your own. Anyway, I don’t just want naked data. I want to see you try to explain how it helps your case. You know that and you’re afraid to try.
Genuinely, you think a link to a research site will give you CP and put you on a watch list?
Christ dude. No wonder you’re uninformed. You’re so paranoid you believe all your fears without any logic. Do you even go outside your home? Do you have newspaper over your windows so spies don’t see you?
I’m surprised you’re even on the internet at all.
I know the “last word” bit is fun, but we both know it’s a cop out. You’re too afraid to actually look at data that may compromise your precious imagined worldview.