Just wanted to mention how well Vance did. He held Walz and Harris's feet to the fire. He nailed them to the walls. He looked professional, kind and spoke eloquently. Vance did phenomenally. Walz looked like a nutcase, especially during that China question.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
having a good debate performance - to me - indicates an organized mind, a quick mind, a solid stance and position on a myriad of topics that you can talk about when prompted.
A person can PREPARE for a debate, and many do, but a good mind will do well in a debate.
Waltz may have a good mind, but his stance and position is FAKE because he is a totalitarian dictator and a literal communist and he is trying to hide it, so his house of cards fake campaign persona as a folksy neighborly kind of fella is indefensible and plainly did not hold up.
Public speaking is different skill vs actually implementing something.
Which is why the Engineer Types are typically not the best socially. If you follow history.
A lot of SCAMMERS are good speakers dude.
It means nothing.
there's a lot of people who are very wary about Vance or don't like him at all for various reasons. For all I know he's a snake like Pence. I don't know the guy.
But assuming his book/movie is factual, based on that and his debate performance alone, he seems like a decent guy.
Right now what matters is that he is helping us win the election. We (or Trump) will deal with him later if he’s dirty as we have with everyone else that got exposed when Trump pulled their heads out of the swamp for everyone to see.
As a kid. I was taught that the devil is the father of lies.
I disagree now.
The devil is the father of truth in my opinion. Except... the devil knows how to distort the truth by over dramatizing or downplaying it.
So good speakers is the key to deception.
This is how I view the world now.