This Storm was an Operation
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
It is routine for NOAA to send surveillance airplanes (WP-3Ds) into hurricanes to obtain meteorologic data. Called Hurricane Hunters. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_hunters It would be strange if it were not there.
But that's no fun. :( Surely it's wEaTher ConTrol. What in the world could a single plane do to a FUCKING HURRICANE?! People around here are getting really, realllly dumb, and do not have a sense of scale.
It took only 180 pounds of dry ice to alter the path of Hurricane King by 135 degrees, and that was done in 1947. The average American adult weighs more than that. How much can a single plane do? Quite a lot, evidently.
And when they are chastised for being "dumb" (I would say ignorant and clueless), there are severe penalties if egos are bruised. I think this is a symptom of a general syndrome in social media: anyone who takes the effort, however trivial or passive, to follow a topic will consider themselves an expert on the topic and will expound accordingly, having no capability to identify actual experts, whom they abuse as being stuffy or "not awake yet." Deviation from the social consensus is the litmus test of credibility (ironic when compared to the Covid-19 fiasco). Am I wrong? The admins are in the middle of this, and you can notice a certain variability in what nonsense is tolerated for discussion. They don't say much about their workload, other than that it is burdensome. But if you consider that every day may bring hundreds of posts under their eyes, it would not be surprising if the fine line between fair speculation and wild stuff becomes blurred.
Someone once proposed that all the loony theories are actually psy-ops from outside, intended to undermine the credibility of the community. I think that theory has a lot of explanatory value, and it sure works. As the years have passed, I have become less inclined to recommend this page to newcomers, on account of this aspect.
Well I appreciate the time you took to type out your thoughts. You were a bit more eloquent than I was. I find myself coming here less and less as the laughable sources/already debunked/plain ignorant of basic science, etc. shows up. Everything is a conspiracy with the weakest 'evidence' provided; this post being a good example of that. I think after Trump returns to office, I'll leave here for good, as they'll be no more use for it, and I can have some sanity back ;)
“Therefore we do not lose heart. Even though our outward man is perishing, yet the inward man is being renewed day by day. For our light affliction, which is but for a moment, is working for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory, while we do not look at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen. For the things which are seen are temporary, but the things which are not seen are eternal.” II Corinthians 4:16-18 NKJV
Be encouraged and have a better day
You have my complete sympathy. I suppose I will linger in order to assess the match-up between what happens after Trump gets in office, with the attitudes and expectations here.
I also look at it as something of an intellectual challenge to see how efficiently I can function as a critic and an explainer. Sometimes, I come up with a Bright Idea, but that gets lost in the wave action. Very difficult to work with the types who like to dish it out but can't take it. It seems I've gotten banned for complaints of "bad manners" by people who end by cursing me out. I suppose I am at risk by even mentioning such "types." And yet, the spectrum you have identified seems to prevail.
I will close with a joke--- Airhead Girl: "I enjoy classical music, especially when it celebrates pastries." Girlfriend: "What? I mean, what are you talking about?" Airhead Girl: "Well, you know. Like Claude Debussy's 'Eclair de Lune'."