Yeah, I 100% know that the vax is a time bomb, but this study kind of sux if you want to use it to show evidence of that fact. There are two issues to be aware of if you want to use this, so be ready to counter: 1. There was no “control”,
Because it was a study of other ‘studies’. 2. It was only through March 2022. They need to do a study through mid-2024. 2023 was when when a shit ton of those kids who got ‘boosted’ had horrible outcomes. We need a hard core, “peer-reviewed” publication. FYI, on a personal opine, peer-reviewing anything is no longer valuable. All sciences, Medical or otherwise, have been almost completely compromised.
Yeah, I 100% know that the vax is a time bomb, but this study kind of sux if you want to use it to show evidence of that fact. There are two issues to be aware of if you want to use this, so be ready to counter: 1. There was no “control”, Because it was a study of other ‘studies’. 2. It was only through March 2022. They need to do a study through mid-2024. 2023 was when when a shit ton of those kids who got ‘boosted’ had horrible outcomes. We need a hard core, “peer-reviewed” publication. FYI, on a personal opine, peer-reviewing anything is no longer valuable. All sciences, Medical or otherwise, have been almost completely compromised.
Peer reviewing has become an incestuous and exclusive club, for sure.
Criticizing methodology is fair and important grounds though, science needs sound methodology with reproducible results.
Circular affirmations fueled by grant and royalty monies. The minute you monetize science, it no longer becomes science.