Yeah, I 100% know that the vax is a time bomb, but this study kind of sux if you want to use it to show evidence of that fact. There are two issues to be aware of if you want to use this, so be ready to counter: 1. There was no “control”,
Because it was a study of other ‘studies’. 2. It was only through March 2022. They need to do a study through mid-2024. 2023 was when when a shit ton of those kids who got ‘boosted’ had horrible outcomes. We need a hard core, “peer-reviewed” publication. FYI, on a personal opine, peer-reviewing anything is no longer valuable. All sciences, Medical or otherwise, have been almost completely compromised.
That is only one type of control group. There are at least three -- one of which is completely satisfied by this scenario.
Types of Control Groups:
Placebo Control Group: Receives an inert treatment (like a sugar pill), which looks identical to the actual treatment but has no therapeutic effect. This helps to measure the placebo effect.
Active Control Group: Receives an existing, standard treatment for the condition. This is used when it would be unethical to give a placebo because an effective treatment already exists.
No Treatment Control Group: Receives no treatment at all, which can be used when the natural progression of the disease or condition is well understood and withholding treatment doesn't pose ethical issues.
Yeah, where in that study did they present a control group? I didnt see one, but I might have missed it. How many werenin the control group if there was one?
BY DEFINITION, a control group is all the people who DIDN'T 'take the medicine'.
So when this study says that 'among those that didn't take the vaxx', there were ZERO kids who got myocarditis or pericarditis -- THAT is the control group.
If you disagree, please tell me what the criteria of 'being in a control group' would be? (Hint: It's 'not taking the vaxx'.)
Yeah, thats not how it works. It isnt. The control subjects are known and evaluated to present a "baseline group not presented the thing being monitored or studied". Just saying "everyone else is the control". No, sorry, thats not a control group fren. It isnt.
This is a review of studies with similar cohorts to analyze the data in a pool- a metanalysis. The "controls" are in each individual study in the review- 12 studies were included after removing duplicates and studies that didn't fit the criteria and/or patient age groups
Yeah, I 100% know that the vax is a time bomb, but this study kind of sux if you want to use it to show evidence of that fact. There are two issues to be aware of if you want to use this, so be ready to counter: 1. There was no “control”, Because it was a study of other ‘studies’. 2. It was only through March 2022. They need to do a study through mid-2024. 2023 was when when a shit ton of those kids who got ‘boosted’ had horrible outcomes. We need a hard core, “peer-reviewed” publication. FYI, on a personal opine, peer-reviewing anything is no longer valuable. All sciences, Medical or otherwise, have been almost completely compromised.
Peer reviewing has become an incestuous and exclusive club, for sure.
Criticizing methodology is fair and important grounds though, science needs sound methodology with reproducible results.
Circular affirmations fueled by grant and royalty monies. The minute you monetize science, it no longer becomes science.
I don't understand 'there is no control'.
The 'control' group is made up of the kids that did NOT get vaxxed.
What other type of 'control' is there?
They were supposed to get a placebo shot, according to the so called experts.
That is only one type of control group. There are at least three -- one of which is completely satisfied by this scenario.
Types of Control Groups:
Yeah, where in that study did they present a control group? I didnt see one, but I might have missed it. How many werenin the control group if there was one?
BY DEFINITION, a control group is all the people who DIDN'T 'take the medicine'.
So when this study says that 'among those that didn't take the vaxx', there were ZERO kids who got myocarditis or pericarditis -- THAT is the control group.
If you disagree, please tell me what the criteria of 'being in a control group' would be? (Hint: It's 'not taking the vaxx'.)
Yeah, thats not how it works. It isnt. The control subjects are known and evaluated to present a "baseline group not presented the thing being monitored or studied". Just saying "everyone else is the control". No, sorry, thats not a control group fren. It isnt.
This is a review of studies with similar cohorts to analyze the data in a pool- a metanalysis. The "controls" are in each individual study in the review- 12 studies were included after removing duplicates and studies that didn't fit the criteria and/or patient age groups
👍👌